Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment 9 had the maximum benefit cost ratio of 2.41.

A claim from Effect of Sulphur and Zinc on Growth and Yield of Black Gram (Phaseolus mungo L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 9 had the maximum benefit cost ratio of 2.41.

Taxon
Black GramVigna mungot0
Treatment
Sulphur (30 kg/ha) + Zinc (10kg/ha)e1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
2.41e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Black Gram (Phaseolus mungo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–81
e0

“The (treatment 9) also recorded Maximum benefit cost ratio (2.41)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–652
e1

“Sulphur (30 kg/ha) + Zinc (10kg/ha) (treatment 9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–432

Title

Effect of Sulphur and Zinc on Growth and Yield of Black Gram (Phaseolus mungo L.)

Sanjay Kumar; Karishma Singh; Joy Dawson International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2024. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i54594

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e5a8a3c453d7673a0fb9349c8250d66322e3845d5f1cbd1bc22d1c8996346f91 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results differ

35 papers: 33 positive, 2 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.