Recommendationmodel-written summary

The authors concluded digestate may have less impact on soil microflora diversity and function than conventional fertilizers.

A claim from Nutrient recovery from anaerobic digestion of food waste: impacts of digestate on plant growth and rhizosphere bacterial community composition and potential function in ryegrass · 2020

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded digestate may have less impact on soil microflora diversity and function than conventional fertilizers.

Taxon
Annual ryegrasse1
Outcome
use of digestate can readily be incorporated into agricultural practicese0
Comparator
conventional fertilizerse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“the use of digestate can readily be incorporated into agricultural practices with potentially less impact on soil microflora diversity and function than conventional fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1789
e1

“Annual ryegrass growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–528

Title

Nutrient recovery from anaerobic digestion of food waste: impacts of digestate on plant growth and rhizosphere bacterial community composition and potential function in ryegrass

Ai-Tian Ren; Lynette K. Abbott; Yinglong Chen; et al. Biology and Fertility of Soils 2020. doi:10.1007/s00374-020-01477-6

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e5b669450b9abdcc05bbea690c22468aa4b4d3f88888afaa28128d69ea7a4259 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer