Claim · model-written summary
Numerous morphological indicators of phase change in Betula were identified.
- Outcome
- morphological indicators of phase changee0
BetulaNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Numerous morphological indicators of phase change in Betula were identified.”
Title
IN VITRO REJUVENATION OF BETULA (BETULACEAE): MORPHOLOGICAL EVALUATION
Mark H. Brand; R. Daniel Lineberger American Journal of Botany 1992. doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb14603.x
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Micropropagated Betula plants initially differed morphologically from conventionally propagated mature plants and showed seedling features.
- Intervention effect Micropropagated Betula plants with juvenile morphology developed mature morphology faster than seed-grown plants.
- Observation Some mature-phase characteristics did not return in micropropagated Betula during the study.
- Intervention effect In vitro micropropagation appears to rejuvenate Betula, although regained juvenility may be below seedling levels.
- Observation In vitro rejuvenation affected Betula phase-change indicators unequally.