Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No significant differences existed between cultivation treatments in looseness of soil or its non-capillary porosity at 0–4 in.

A claim from Effects of soil cultivation on the growth and yield of winter wheat. IV‐effects of cultivation on root development · 1952

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant differences existed between cultivation treatments in looseness of soil or its non-capillary porosity at 0–4 in.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cultivation treatmentse1
Outcome
looseness of soile2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Qualifier
at depths of 0–4 ine2
Comparator
between the treatmentse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cultivation treatments consisted of ploughing to a depth of 8 in., deep cultivation (4 in.) and shallow cultivation (2 in.) with a tined cultivator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–331
e2

“No significant differences existed between the treatments in respect of looseness of soil or its non‐capillary porosity at depths of 0–4 in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–697
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67

Title

Effects of soil cultivation on the growth and yield of winter wheat. IV‐effects of cultivation on root development

Khazan Singh Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1952. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740031105

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e60cfa797aec8b5115a72a3a7789caa0f1c356d7a2b1fb67f75b482730c38ef7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer