Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ploughing to 8 in. increased non-capillary porosity of the soil in the 4–8 in. layer compared with tine cultivations.

A claim from Effects of soil cultivation on the growth and yield of winter wheat. IV‐effects of cultivation on root development · 1952

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughing to 8 in. increased non-capillary porosity of the soil in the 4–8 in. layer compared with tine cultivations.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Ploughing to a depth of 8 in.e0
Outcome
non‐capillary porositye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in this layere0
Comparator
tine cultivationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ploughing to a depth of 8 in. loosened the soil of the ploughed plots in the 4–8‐in. layer and increased the non‐capillary porosity of the soil (aeration) in this layer compared with the 4‐in. and 2‐in. tine cultivations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–556
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67

Title

Effects of soil cultivation on the growth and yield of winter wheat. IV‐effects of cultivation on root development

Khazan Singh Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1952. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740031105

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-18d6972aef9bb873afffd22f660c2857d13ea45ef4cf87414a8148ae767239cb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 118 positive, 24 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

133 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.