Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A 50% nitrogen deficit significantly increased all assimilation pigments in bean leaves.

A claim from THE EFFECT OF SALINITY AND NITROGEN DEFICIENCY ON THE CHANGES IN SELECTED PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF COMMON BEAN (PHASEOLEUS VULGARIS L.) GROWN IN HYDROPONIC CULTURES · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% nitrogen deficit significantly increased all assimilation pigments in bean leaves.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
50% nitrogen deficiency in mediume0
Outcome
concentration of all assimilation pigmentse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 50% nitrogen deficiency in medium induced a significant increase in the concentration of all assimilation pigments in common bean leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1215

Title

THE EFFECT OF SALINITY AND NITROGEN DEFICIENCY ON THE CHANGES IN SELECTED PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF COMMON BEAN (PHASEOLEUS VULGARIS L.) GROWN IN HYDROPONIC CULTURES

Jacek Wróbel; Alicja Auriga; Marcin Mielczarek Journal of Ecological Engineering 2016. doi:10.12911/22998993/64557

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e61a016090e1df6420998c18df1303d1495718b54764f5941960b8893ae9b5fd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

in vitro · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.