Paper · 2015 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Common bean canopy characteristics and N assimilation as affected by weed pressure and nitrogen rate

S. F. SABERALI; S. A. M. MODARRES-SANAVY; M. BANNAYAN; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Crop canopy characteristics and management factors that affect the canopy structure can influence crop competitive ability against weeds. The goal of the current study was to understand the interaction between nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus ) density on common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) canopy characteristics and N assimilation. Experiments were conducted to determine the growth responses of two bean genotypes with contrasting growth habits to different N fertilizer rates under no, low and high redroot pigweed pressure. Nitrogen was applied at rates of 0, 50, 100 and 200 kg/ha for a semi-erect variety and 0, 35, 70 and 140 kg/ha for an erect bean variety. Leaf area index (LAI), leaf area duration (LAD), leaf chlorophyll, N assimilation and N assimilation rate for both bean growth habits increased with N application rate at no and low weed density. The negative effect of redroot pigweed competition on LAI, LAD, N assimilation and N assimilation rate increased with redroot pigweed density, and with N application rate for the high weed density. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that N assimilation and chlorophyll concentration accounted for 0·73–0·87, overall, of the variation in yield loss due to weed competition. It is concluded that greater N assimilation in the semi-erect growth habit compared with the erect growth habit is the cause of its higher competitive ability against the weed, as it improves the effective canopy traits that confer potential for resource pre-emption.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate increased leaf area index and duration at no and low weed density.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
N application ratee0
Interactor
redroot pigweede1weed
Outcome
Leaf area index (LAI), leaf area duration (LAD)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
no and low weed densitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index (LAI), leaf area duration (LAD), leaf chlorophyll, N assimilation and N assimilation rate for both bean growth habits increased with N application rate at no and low weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–912 · show in text ↑
e1

“redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus ) density on common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate increased leaf chlorophyll and N assimilation at no and low weed density.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
N application ratee0
Interactor
redroot pigweede1weed
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll, N assimilation and N assimilation ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
no and low weed densitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index (LAI), leaf area duration (LAD), leaf chlorophyll, N assimilation and N assimilation rate for both bean growth habits increased with N application rate at no and low weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–912 · show in text ↑
e1

“redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus ) density on common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–341 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigweed density intensified negative effects on bean canopy and nitrogen assimilation.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Interactor
redroot pigweede0weed
Outcome
negative effect of redroot pigweed competition on LAI, LAD, N assimilation and N assimilation ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative effect of redroot pigweed competition on LAI, LAD, N assimilation and N assimilation rate increased with redroot pigweed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–341 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen intensified pigweed competition effects at high weed density.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
N application ratee0
Interactor
redroot pigweede0weed
Outcome
negative effect of redroot pigweed competitione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
high weed densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative effect of redroot pigweed competition on LAI, LAD, N assimilation and N assimilation rate increased with redroot pigweed density, and with N application rate for the high weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1110 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–341 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N assimilation and chlorophyll explained 0·73–0·87 of yield loss variation from weed competition.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Interactor
redroot pigweede2weed
Outcome
variation in yield loss due to weed competitione0
Value
0·73–0·87e0
Qualifier
N assimilation and chlorophyll concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N assimilation and chlorophyll concentration accounted for 0·73–0·87, overall, of the variation in yield loss due to weed competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1295 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–341 · show in text ↑
e2

“nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate and redroot pigweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–266 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed semi-erect bean competitive ability to greater nitrogen assimilation and effective canopy traits.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Material
semi-erect growth habite0
Interactor
redroot pigweede2weed
Outcome
competitive ability against the weede0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
greater N assimilatione0
Comparator
erect growth habite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater N assimilation in the semi-erect growth habit compared with the erect growth habit is the cause of its higher competitive ability against the weed, as it improves the effective canopy traits that confer potential for resource pre-emption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1563 · show in text ↑
e1

“common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–341 · show in text ↑
e2

“nitrogen (N) fertilizer rate and redroot pigweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–266 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 44 positive, 16 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.