Observationmodel-written summary

For both rootstocks, nonfruiting spur leaves had intermediate photosynthesis rates.

A claim from Apple tree canopy development and photosynthesis as affected by rootstock · 1991

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For both rootstocks, nonfruiting spur leaves had intermediate photosynthesis rates.

Organ / stage
S − F leavese0
Outcome
P n ratee1
Direction
intermediatee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S − F leaves had intermediate values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1134
e1

“Shoot leaves, spur leaves on spurs without fruit (S − F), and spur leaves on spurs with fruit (S + F) from trees on M.26 EMLA and OAR 1 showed no differences in P n rates. However, for both rootstocks, shoot leaves had the highest P n rate, S + F the lowest, and S − F leaves had intermediate values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1134
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5

Title

Apple tree canopy development and photosynthesis as affected by rootstock

Ido Schechter; D. C. Elfving; J. T. A. Proctor Canadian Journal of Botany 1991. doi:10.1139/b91-039

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e65dbe059e80cd214895719b2d9e2d73cbae2547a2a09a24c489198452ac67ca · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer