Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under no tillage, fall grazing tended to improve corn yield.

A claim from Long‐Term Corn Residue Grazing Improves Subsequent Soybean Yields in a Corn–Soybean Rotation · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under no tillage, fall grazing tended to improve corn yield.

Treatment
fall/winter grazede1
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
improvee0
Value
211 bu/acree0
Comparator
not grazede2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FG tended ( P = 0.07; 211 bu/acre) to improve corn yield over NG (207 bu/acre)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1445
e1

“fall/winter grazed (FG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–317
e2

“not grazed (NG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–423

Title

Long‐Term Corn Residue Grazing Improves Subsequent Soybean Yields in a Corn–Soybean Rotation

Mary E. Drewnoski; Jim C. MacDonald; Galen E. Erickson; et al. Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management 2016. doi:10.2134/cftm2015.0192

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e674262d7708caf3df2506c9b07ae025e4b6fed5c6e71d2afd08cb55f0f557ad · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

grazing · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

36 papers: 11 positive, 25 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.