Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined inoculants significantly increased grain nitrogen and phosphorus contents.

A claim from VIGNA RADIATA ROOT ASSOCIATED MYCORRHIZAE AND THEIR HELPING BACTERIA FOR IMPROVING CROP PRODUCTIVITY · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculants significantly increased grain nitrogen and phosphorus contents.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatae1
Treatment
application of bacterial and arbuscular mycorrhizal consortiume0
Interactor
bacterial and arbuscular mycorrhizal consortiume0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus contentse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase in the biomass, nodulation, total grain yield, nitrogen and phosphorus contents was observed with the application of bacterial and arbuscular mycorrhizal consortium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–669
e1

“grain of Vigna radiata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–480

Title

VIGNA RADIATA ROOT ASSOCIATED MYCORRHIZAE AND THEIR HELPING BACTERIA FOR IMPROVING CROP PRODUCTIVITY

Tahira Yasmeen; Sohail Hameed; Mohsin Tariq; et al. Pakistan Journal of Botany 2012

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e68f40c9d764e5d0780b10d50a8feba1faf802b88c70e50911ba1199c0dd8663 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.