Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter root inoculation significantly affected tobacco price per kg.
- Taxon
- TOBACCO
Nicotiana tabacumt0 - Treatment
- Inoculation of roots with Azotobactere0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- price per kge0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“TOBACCO (NICOTIANA TABACUM L.)”
e0“Inoculation of roots with Azotobacter had significant effect on dry weight of priming, the price per kg, nitrogen uptake and qualitative characteristics.”
Title
Sabeti Amirhandeh; A R Falah Nosratabad; Majid Norouzi; et al. 2012
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer significantly affected tobacco quantitative characteristics other than leaf number, width and leaf area index.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer significantly affected tobacco nitrogen uptake.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer significantly affected tobacco qualitative characteristics.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer increased tobacco dry weight over no nitrogen fertilizer.
- Intervention effect Azotobacter root inoculation significantly affected priming dry weight.
- Intervention effect Azotobacter root inoculation significantly affected tobacco nitrogen uptake.
- Intervention effect Azotobacter root inoculation significantly affected tobacco qualitative characteristics.
- Intervention effect Combined nitrogen fertilizer and Azotobacter increased nitrogen uptake over control.
- Intervention effect Combined nitrogen fertilizer and Azotobacter increased nicotine over control.
- Intervention effect Combined nitrogen fertilizer and Azotobacter decreased sugar over control.
- Observation N4B3 produced maximum nicotine in priming.
- Observation N4B3 produced minimum sugar in tips.
- Observation N3B2 produced maximum tobacco price per kg.
- Observation Azotobacter inoculation was economically most efficient at lower nitrogen doses.