Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield under traditional irrigation was 32.2% higher than under 40% water-saving irrigation.
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- traditional irrigatione1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- increasese1
- Value
- 32.2%e1
- Comparator
- 40% water-saving irrigatione1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat”
e1“The increases of grain yield in traditional irrigation were 8.2% and 32.2% when compared with 20% water-saving irrigation and 40% water-saving irrigation”
Title
YU Hua-lin Acta Pratacultural Science 2012
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Irrigation increased soil water content at 80-120 cm depth measured 24 h before irrigation and at 0-80 cm depth measured 24 h after irrigation.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen application had no significant effect on soil water content at 0-120 cm depth.
- Association Soil water storage and water consumption rate increased with the amount of irrigation.
- Intervention effect Soil water storage was significantly higher without nitrogen application than with nitrogen application.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen application did not significantly affect water consumption rate.
- Intervention effect Grain yield was maximal (6 365 kg/hm2) at 221 kg/N hm2 among N treatments across irrigation regimes.
- Intervention effect WUE was maximal (14.51 kg/hm2·mm) at 221 kg/N hm2 among N treatments across irrigation regimes.
- Association Spring wheat grain yield increased with the amount of irrigation.
- Intervention effect Grain yield under traditional irrigation was 8.2% higher than under 20% water-saving irrigation.
- Intervention effect WUE did not differ significantly between irrigation regimes.