Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Post-veraison irrigation increased yield parameters versus non-irrigated vines, more strongly with AVI than MRI.

A claim from Effects of post-veraison irrigation on the phenolic composition of Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Xinomavro’ grapes · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-veraison irrigation increased yield parameters versus non-irrigated vines, more strongly with AVI than MRI.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Xinomavro’Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
Post-veraison irrigatione0
Outcome
yield parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
more pronounced in the case of early post-veraison irrigation (AVI) than late-season irrigation (MRI)e0
Comparator
NI vinese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-veraison irrigation increased yield parameters and reduced anthocyanin levels and the proportion of their stable forms (acylated vs. non-acylated, tri-oxygenated and methoxylated on the B-ring vs. di-oxygenated and hydroxylated), compared to NI vines; however, these effects were more pronounced in the case of early post-veraison irrigation (AVI) than late-season irrigation (MRI).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1802
t0

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Xinomavro’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–100

Title

Effects of post-veraison irrigation on the phenolic composition of Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Xinomavro’ grapes

Seraphim Theocharis; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Eleftheria Zioziou; et al. OENO One 2021. doi:10.20870/oeno-one.2021.55.3.4706

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e6ed938bb1d382e11af169ffc499ca4bb106b240ad12b87105006421ce811047 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.