Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Berry yield per grapevine was higher in minimally pruned grapevines with adequate water supply, possibly due to a larger number of nodes per vine.

A claim from Post-Veraison Water Stress and Pruning Level on Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): Effects on Berry Development and Composition · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry yield per grapevine was higher in minimally pruned grapevines with adequate water supply, possibly due to a larger number of nodes per vine.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferat0
Material
Merlott0
Treatment
minimally pruned grapevines with adequate water supplye1
Outcome
berry yield per grapevinee1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
possibly due to the increased number of nodes per vinee1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–84
e1

“higher berry yield per grapevine was scored in minimally pruned grapevines with adequate water supply, possibly due to the increased number of nodes per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1897–2054

Title

Post-Veraison Water Stress and Pruning Level on Merlot Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): Effects on Berry Development and Composition

Dargie Tsegay Berhe International Journal of Agronomy 2022. doi:10.1155/2022/7307078

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-e9cf57ce0d44c6b70cd9deb072e5320b01769b3304b88f14c003dc8bf6afdc8d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

pruning · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 41 positive, 54 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 51 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.