Paper · 2012 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Classification of Grape Berries According to Diameter and Total Soluble Solids To Study the Effect of Light and Temperature on Methoxypyrazine, Glutathione, and Hydroxycinnamate Evolution during Ripening of Sauvignon blanc (Vitis vinifera L.)

Katja Šuklje; Klemen Lisjak; Helena Baša Česnik; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grape berries were classified according to diameter and total soluble solids (TSS) to study the effect of light and temperature on methoxypyrazines (MPs), glutathione (GSH), and hydroxycinnamates (HCAs) during the ripening of Sauvignon blanc. The light exposure of the fruiting zone was modified within leaf and lateral removal at the phenological stage berry of peppercorn size and no removal (control). In comparison to the control, the concentration of 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP) was below the limit of detection in leaf removal 2 weeks before harvest. Leaf removal had no significant influence on GSH and HCAs in the grape juice at harvest. Berry diameter significantly influenced the concentration of IBMP in the grape juice and did not influence the concentration of GSH and HCAs. At harvest, the concentrations of IBMP in grape juices of similar TSS in the control were 12.6 and 5.2 ng/L in 15.5 and 13.5 mm berry diameter classes, respectively. Furthermore, the study showed that berries of the same diameter were not at the same physiological ripening level (not the same TSS).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf removal two weeks before harvest made IBMP concentration in grape juice fall below the limit of detection compared with the control.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
leaf removal 2 weeks before harveste1
Outcome
concentration of 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP)e1
Direction
belowe1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sauvignon blanc (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 207–242 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to the control, the concentration of 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP) was below the limit of detection in leaf removal 2 weeks before harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf removal had no significant influence on glutathione and hydroxycinnamates in grape juice at harvest.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Leaf removale2
Outcome
GSH and HCAs in the grape juice at harveste2
Direction
no significant influencee2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sauvignon blanc (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 207–242 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to the control, the concentration of 3-isobutyl-2-methoxypyrazine (IBMP) was below the limit of detection in leaf removal 2 weeks before harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–563 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf removal had no significant influence on GSH and HCAs in the grape juice at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–652 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry diameter significantly influenced IBMP concentration in grape juice.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Berry diametere3
Outcome
concentration of IBMP in the grape juicee3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sauvignon blanc (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 207–242 · show in text ↑
e3

“Berry diameter significantly influenced the concentration of IBMP in the grape juice and did not influence the concentration of GSH and HCAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–794 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry diameter did not influence glutathione and hydroxycinnamate concentrations in grape juice.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Berry diametere3
Outcome
concentration of GSH and HCAse3
Direction
did not influencee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sauvignon blanc (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 207–242 · show in text ↑
e3

“Berry diameter significantly influenced the concentration of IBMP in the grape juice and did not influence the concentration of GSH and HCAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–794 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, control grape juices of similar TSS had 12.6 and 5.2 ng/L IBMP in the 15.5 and 13.5 mm berry diameter classes.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Outcome
concentrations of IBMP in grape juicese4
Value
12.6 and 5.2 ng/Le4
Qualifier
15.5 and 13.5 mm berry diameter classese4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sauvignon blanc (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 207–242 · show in text ↑
e4

“the concentrations of IBMP in grape juices of similar TSS in the control were 12.6 and 5.2 ng/L in 15.5 and 13.5 mm berry diameter classes, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–960 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berries of the same diameter were not at the same physiological ripening level.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Outcome
physiological ripening levele5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sauvignon blanc (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 207–242 · show in text ↑
e5

“berries of the same diameter were not at the same physiological ripening level (not the same TSS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1094 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 41 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.