Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping soybean at 50 plants m-2 and sorghum at 10 plants m-2 maximized forage ash, DDM and NEL.

A claim from Quantity and Quality Evaluation of the Forage in Sorghum- Soybean Additive Intercropping under the Influence of Nitroxin and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria Bio-Fertilizers · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping soybean at 50 plants m-2 and sorghum at 10 plants m-2 maximized forage ash, DDM and NEL.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
intercropping soybean (50 plants m-2) + sorghum (10 plants m-2)e0
Interactor
soybeanGlycine maxe0other
Outcome
forage ash, digestible dry matter (DDM) and net energy of lactation (NEL)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
monoculture of sorghume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest and lowest values of forage ash, digestible dry matter (DDM) and net energy of lactation (NEL) were obtained in intercropping soybean (50 plants m-2) + sorghum (10 plants m-2) and monoculture of sorghum (15 plants m-2), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1361

Title

Quantity and Quality Evaluation of the Forage in Sorghum- Soybean Additive Intercropping under the Influence of Nitroxin and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria Bio-Fertilizers

Javanmard, A.; Amani Machiani, M.; Janmohammadi, M. Journal of Crop production and processing 2020. doi:10.47176/jcpp.10.1.25225

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e780251b82e28a98a78c14691de8782f92f05c85047338594c23904fb1c8d9fe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Glycine max · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

intercropping · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

33 papers: 26 positive, 7 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.