Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The bromoxynil + MCPA + metribuzin treatment with 2% ammonium sulphate gave maximum weed control in maize.

A claim from FIELD VALIDATION OF AMMONIUM SULPHATE AS AN ACTIVATOR ADJUVANT ON BROMOXYNIL + MCPA + METRIBUZIN EFFICACY AGAINST MAIZE WEEDS · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bromoxynil + MCPA + metribuzin treatment with 2% ammonium sulphate gave maximum weed control in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
bromoxynil + MCPA + metribuzin @ 1250 mL ha -1 + 2% ammonium sulphatee2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
weed controle2
Direction
maximume2
Comparator
weedy checke6
Setting
Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabade1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of herbicides is very important for controlling weeds in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–70
e1

“A field experiment was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad during autumn 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–259
e2

“The bromoxynil + MCPA + metribuzin @ 1250 mL ha -1 + 2% ammonium sulphate gave maximum weed control and minimum dry weight of all weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–844
e6

“The experiment comprised of seven treatments namely weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–456

Title

FIELD VALIDATION OF AMMONIUM SULPHATE AS AN ACTIVATOR ADJUVANT ON BROMOXYNIL + MCPA + METRIBUZIN EFFICACY AGAINST MAIZE WEEDS

Asif Tanveer; Shafīq Aḥmad; Rana Nadeem Abbas; et al. JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH 2015

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e794ae32b36f164c863f40714e241cf6c24632c6a1cd8ef46df231194b267e56 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

ammonium sulfate · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.