Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Reducing the B.th. concentration from 1% to 0.33% had no significant effect on yield.

A claim from Biological control of the Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lep., Noctuidae) in cotton and alfalfa fields using a preparation of Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. entomocidus, supplemented with adjuvants · 1983

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing the B.th. concentration from 1% to 0.33% had no significant effect on yield.

Treatment
Reducing B.th. + concentrations in the spray suspensions from 1% to 0.33%e7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Comparator
1%e7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Reducing B.th. + concentrations in the spray suspensions from 1% to 0.33%, slightly increased numbers of surviving larvae, and had no significant effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–933
t0

“in cotton and alfalfa fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128

Title

Biological control of the Egyptian cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lep., Noctuidae) in cotton and alfalfa fields using a preparation of Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. entomocidus, supplemented with adjuvants

B. Sneh; S. Gross Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 1983. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.1983.tb02662.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e7bcf1d3be2451a33fc0cb9a64a968679733d3385ff07cd19f920985b2b82b08 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 253 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

274 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.