Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Autumn sowing gave greater crop biomass than late-winter sowing.

A claim from A Field Pea Ideotype for Organic Systems of Northern Italy · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn sowing gave greater crop biomass than late-winter sowing.

Taxon
Field peae1
Treatment
autumn sowinge5
Outcome
crop biomasse5
Direction
greatere5
Comparator
late-winter sowinge5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e1

“Field pea can provide protein-rich feed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–48
e5

“Compared with late-winter sowing, autumn sowing led to higher yields (+56%), greater crop biomass and better ability to control weeds from late vegetative stages onwards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1264

Title

A Field Pea Ideotype for Organic Systems of Northern Italy

Paolo Annicchiarico; Laura Filippi Journal of Crop Improvement 2007. doi:10.1300/j411v20n01_11

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e7bf14eb0fc9b341261247316275b4cd0f19449c733bd54f8fd5bcf04198ee5e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

sowing time · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.