Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation gave the highest grain yield.

A claim from Impact of moisture conservation and nutrient-management practices on performance of maize (Zea mays) in Tarai Region of West Bengal · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: irrigatione1
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: higheste0
Value: 4.35 t/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Zea mays* · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0
“irrigation resulted in the highest yield attributes such as cob length, cob girth, 100-grain weight, cob/plant, grain/cob, rows/cob and grain weight/cob, leading to the highest grain yield (4.35 t/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–566

t0
“maize (Zea mays)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–100

e1
“moisture-conservation practices, irrigation resulted”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–385

Title

Impact of moisture conservation and nutrient-management practices on performance of maize (Zea mays) in Tarai Region of West Bengal

BINOY CHHETRI; A.C. SINHA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v62i1.4274

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Irrigation gave the highest yield attributes.
Intervention effect Irrigation gave the highest stover yield.
Intervention effect Irrigation gave the highest harvest index.
Intervention effect Irrigation gave the highest water-use efficiency.
Intervention effect Irrigation gave the highest net returns.
Intervention effect Irrigation gave the highest benefit: cost ratio.
Intervention effect Irrigation significantly increased plant height.
Intervention effect Irrigation significantly increased leaf-area index.
Intervention effect Irrigation significantly increased dry-matter accumulation.
Intervention effect Irrigation significantly increased crop-growth rate.
Intervention effect Irrigation significantly increased nitrogen (89.9 kg/ha), phosphorus (54.3 kg/ha) and potassium (104.1 kg/ha) uptake.
Intervention effect The nutrient treatment gave the highest plant height.
Intervention effect The nutrient treatment gave the highest grain yield.
Intervention effect The nutrient treatment gave the highest stover yield.
Intervention effect The nutrient treatment gave the highest nitrogen.
Intervention effect The nutrient treatment gave the highest net returns.
Intervention effect The 100% RDF plus PSB and Azotobacter treatment gave the highest benefit to cost ratio.
Recommendation The authors recommended irrigation with 75% RDF, PSB, Azotobacter and vermicompost.

Record rev-e7c3cd8bcad3ef7968f84164fa6ca5b60529de3b6f6f51c88c81723848329816 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this claim · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

negative
Nanoparticle irrigation had mostly insignificant inhibitory effects on long-term shoot production.
Colloidal suspensions of clay or titanium dioxide nanoparticles can inhibit leaf growth and transpiration via physical effects on root water transport · 2009
Opposite direction
no effect
Grain yield did not differ significantly between 75% FIT and 100% FIT.
Maize Evapotranspiration, Yield Production Functions, Biomass, Grain Yield, Harvest Index, and Yield Response Factors under Full and Limited Irrigation · 2013 · compared with 100% FIT
Opposite direction
negative
Minimum irrigation lowered average maize yield by 13% versus full irrigation.
Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)
Opposite direction
negative
DI reduced maize yield by 8.8%.
Yield and water productivity of maize and wheat under deficit and raised bed irrigation practices in Egypt · 2012
Opposite direction
negative
Deficit irrigation decreased grain yield and its parameters in maize.
Regulation of Agronomic Traits, Nutrient Uptake, Osmolytes and Antioxidants of Maize as Influenced by Exogenous Potassium Silicate under Deficit Irrigation and Semiarid Conditions · 2020
Opposite direction
negative
Limited irrigation yielded 86% of full irrigation for corn.
Cropping Systems for Stretching Limited Irrigation Supplies · 1993 · compared with fully irrigated
Opposite direction
no effect
Mineral fertilization plus sewage effluent irrigation did not affect maize dry matter yield.
Maize Growth and Changes in Soil Fertility After Irrigation with Treated Sewage Effluent. I. Plant Dry Matter Yield and Soil Nitrogen and Phosphorus Availability · 2005
Opposite direction
negative
Brackish water irrigation reduced maize yield, more in 2018 than 2017.
Effects of Irrigation Water Salinity on Soil Properties, N2O Emission and Yield of Spring Maize under Mulched Drip Irrigation · 2019
Opposite direction

1,007 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results