Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Botrytis inoculation rapidly increased ethylene production in tomato fruit versus controls during storage.

A claim from Effect of fungal infection on ethylene production, ACC synthase and lipoxygenase activity in tomato fruits · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botrytis inoculation rapidly increased ethylene production in tomato fruit versus controls during storage.

Material
cv Zhongjia 1e0
Treatment
inoculated by Botrytis cinereae0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
ethylene productione0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
during 7 days storage at 25℃e0
Comparator
control fruitse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato fruits ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., cv Zhongjia 1) inoculated by Botrytis cinerea showed a rapid increase in ethylene production, and the higher activities of ACC synthase and lipoxygenase (LOX) as compared to control fruits during 7 days storage at 25℃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–264

Title

Effect of fungal infection on ethylene production, ACC synthase and lipoxygenase activity in tomato fruits

Shi-Ping Tian; Ya Luo; Qin Gong; et al. 2002

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e7d4712db68e114fc2a4250c36e739a3be4755936bc1eab76fed4b3bb9eacfc8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Botrytis cinerea · physiology: hormones · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: hormones · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.