Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Planting alfalfa with corn and harvesting corn as silage increased alfalfa stand by 27%.

A claim from Establishment Methods for Alfalfa in Irrigated Corn1 · 1974

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting alfalfa with corn and harvesting corn as silage increased alfalfa stand by 27%.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
alfalfa was planted simultaneously with the corn and the corn harvested as silagee0
Interactor
cornZea mays subsp. mayse0other
Outcome
Alfalfa stande0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27e0
Comparator
alfalfa planted at last cultivation or following silage harveste1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · InteractorDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa stand and yield were increased 27 and 9%, respectively, when alfalfa was planted simultaneously with the corn and the corn harvested as silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–846
e1

“compared to alfalfa planted at last cultivation or following silage harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1049

Title

Establishment Methods for Alfalfa in Irrigated Corn1

P. T. Nordquist; G. A. Wicks Agronomy Journal 1974. doi:10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600030012x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e7fdd82f11b50a591eea2cd64b680e878459c57461c8e20905ff98f3b1a7a26a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Zea mays subsp. mays · organism · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

processing · organism · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.