Intervention effectmodel-written summary

K uptake per unit area increased 47%.

A claim from Effect of micro-sprinkler system on input use efficiency, labour cost and economic viability in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) seedling production · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K uptake per unit area increased 47%.

Taxon
tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum)Nicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
Micro sprinklerse0
Outcome
uptake per unit areae0
Direction
increasese0
Value
47%e0
Comparator
rose can wateringe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–123
e0

“Micro sprinklers increases the N, P, K concentrations of the total plant to an extent of 14%, 10%, 11% and uptake per unit area to an extent of 50%, 45%, 47% respectively over the rose can watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–889

Title

Effect of micro-sprinkler system on input use efficiency, labour cost and economic viability in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) seedling production

B KRISHNA RAO; C CHANDRASEKARARAO; M ANURADHA; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2014. doi:10.56093/ijas.v84i4.39451

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-e82dddf0a6b9caaf3ae7d0edd5b1d66d2962fc20421ddb1055015f6d99b3ce87 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

irrigation · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.