Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Saline irrigation at 8.3 dS/m significantly reduced plant height compared with fresh water.

A claim from THE EFFECT OF SALINITY OF IRRIGATION WATER AND SPRAYING BY HUMIC ACID IN SOME OF MORPHOLOGICAL, PHYSIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES, GROWTH AND YIELD OF WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation at 8.3 dS/m significantly reduced plant height compared with fresh water.

Treatment
saline watere2
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
significant reductione2
Value
41.09 cme2
Qualifier
at salinity level of 8.3 ds m-1e2
Comparator
fresh watere2
Setting
pots experimente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pots experiment was conducted at the Department of Biology/College of Education for Girls/University of Anbar during Autumn season of 2018-2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–145
e1

“traits of wheat cv. IPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–304
e2

“The results showed that there was significant reduction in plant height, vegetative dry weight, biological yield and chlorophyll leaves content when the plants were irrigated by saline water approached to 41.09 cm, 0.747 g, 0.849 g plant-1 and 38.67 SPAD, respectively at salinity level of 8.3 ds m-1 compared with the plants which irrigated by fresh water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–945

Title

THE EFFECT OF SALINITY OF IRRIGATION WATER AND SPRAYING BY HUMIC ACID IN SOME OF MORPHOLOGICAL, PHYSIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES, GROWTH AND YIELD OF WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.)

E. K. Al-Fahdawe; A. A. Al-Sumaidaie; Y. K. Al-Hadithy Iraqi Journal of Desert Studies 2020. doi:10.36531/ijds/20100101

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e832f1e57f5a4a316a40db00ef8cce5f06beca1ee85b63b2304479a93eec1bdc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Saline stress inhibited wheat growth and germination less than alkaline stress did.

    Germination, growth, osmotic adjustment and ionic balance of wheat in response to saline and alkaline stresses · 2009 · compared with alkaline stress

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Genotype SARC-1 had the maximum shoot dry weight under salinity relative to control.

    Salt‐resistant and salt‐sensitive wheat genotypes show similar biochemical reaction at protein level in the first phase of salt stress · 2006 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Wheat produced more biomass and grain than field pea and dry bean under moderate salinity, but not more than canola.

    Comparing Canola, Field Pea, Dry Bean, and Durum Wheat Crops Grown in Saline Media · 2001 · compared with the pea and the bean crops

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Wheat cv. Imam tolerated salt stress up to 6.25 dS m-1 at BR 0 for germination velocity, germination rate and final germination rate, relative to no salt.

    Seed treatment with 24-epibrassinolide improves wheat germination undersalinity stress · 2023 · compared with no salt (0.00 dSm -1)

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Mahon-Demias showed good callus induction and ability to proliferate and regenerate seedlings under heat and salt stress compared with Hidhab.

    Callus Induction, Proliferation, and Plantlets Regeneration of Two Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) Genotypes under Saline and Heat Stress Conditions · 2011 · compared with Hidhab

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Tolerant cultivars had less biomass reduction under salt treatment.

    Role of mineral nutrients, antioxidants, osmotic adjustment and PSII stability in salt tolerance of contrasting wheat genotypes · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Root length increased at both salt concentrations.

    EVALUATION OF GENETIC VARIABILITY FOR SALT TOLERANCE IN WHEAT · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Stress significantly reduced leaf area, with salt at 1509 cm2.

    Effects of Environmental Stresses (Heat, Salt, Waterlogging) on Grain Yield and Associated Traits of Wheat under Application of Sulfur-Coated Urea · 2021 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

368 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.