Claim · model-written summary
In Wife, 50 ppm CuO nanoparticles increased CBD by 19.9% against control.
- Taxon
- hemp
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativat0 - Material
- Wifee1
- Treatment
- CuO nanoparticles at 50 and 100 ppme0
- Outcome
- CBDe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 19.9%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CuO nanoparticles at 50 and 100 ppm significantly increased THC and CBD levels, compared to the control, respectively, by 18% and 27% for THC and 19.9% and 33.6% for CBD”
e1“In Wife, Cu caused significant temporal increases”
t0“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”
Title
Meghan S. Cahill; Terri Arsenault; Trung Huu Bui; et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2024. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.3c07819
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect In Wife, copper increased THC during growth by 33% at harvest 3.
- Intervention effect In Wife, copper increased THC by 31% at harvest 4.
- Intervention effect In Wife, copper increased CBD by 51% at harvest 3.
- Intervention effect In Wife, copper increased CBD by 16.5% at harvest 4.
- Intervention effect In Wife, 50 ppm CuO nanoparticles increased THC by 18% against control.
- Intervention effect In Wife, 100 ppm CuO nanoparticles increased THC by 27% against control.
- Intervention effect In Wife, 100 ppm CuO nanoparticles increased CBD by 33.6% against control.
- Intervention effect CuO nanoparticle-treated Wife inflorescences had significantly more copper than control and bulk CuO treatments.
- Intervention effect Copper produced no temporal cannabinoid induction in Merlot.
- Intervention effect In Merlot, copper ions increased THC by 27% against control.
- Intervention effect In Merlot, copper ions increased CBD by 36% against control.
- Intervention effect Particulate copper did not induce THC or CBD in Merlot.