Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 10 cm, 10-row arrangement performed better for main stem leaf number, top fourth leaf width and fruit branch number.

A claim from Effect of Field Arrangement in Apricot-cotton Intercropping on Cotton Plant Growth and Tempo-spatial Distribution of Boll · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 10 cm, 10-row arrangement performed better for main stem leaf number, top fourth leaf width and fruit branch number.

Treatment
10 cm plant spacing,10 rows(B)e1
Outcome
main stem leaf number,width of the top fourth leaf and fruit branch numbere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
otherse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75
e0

“a better performance in main stem leaf number,width of the top fourth leaf and fruit branch number than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–504
e1

“field arrangement with 10 cm plant spacing,10 rows(B) has the lowest length-width ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–389

Title

Effect of Field Arrangement in Apricot-cotton Intercropping on Cotton Plant Growth and Tempo-spatial Distribution of Boll

Yongqiang Zhang Mianhua xuebao 2013

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e8aa3cbe7a7fcb2db7b8872713d0407b45f2d463c49e94da41749a23e0543a89 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

density · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.