Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pumped or ground water irrigation increased rice yield of PSB Rc28 from 7.27 to 8.58 t/ha compared with conventional irrigation.

A claim from Effect of Ground Water Irrigation on Paddy Rice Yield in Maligaya, Philippines · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumped or ground water irrigation increased rice yield of PSB Rc28 from 7.27 to 8.58 t/ha compared with conventional irrigation.

Material
PSB Rc28e2
Treatment
pumped water or ground water irrigatione0
Outcome
rice yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
from 7.27 to 8.58 t/hae2
Comparator
conventional irrigatione0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the temperature of the standing or flooding water in the field was reduced using pumped water or ground water irrigation compared with the conventional irrigation where water came from irrigation canals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–850
e2

“the lower temperature of the standing water resulted in an increase in rice yield from 7.27 to 8.58 t/ha for PSB Rc28 rice cultivar and from 3.08 to 4.02 t/ha for New Plant Type IR66106-5-3-2-3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1049

Title

Effect of Ground Water Irrigation on Paddy Rice Yield in Maligaya, Philippines

Eduardo Jimmy Pua QUILANG; Larry GUERRA; Avelino RAMIREZ; et al. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology 2004. doi:10.2480/agrmet.60.95

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e8c88ff5a7ef7e3e25ea8897ef7770a9bbc7f21edb42f1f1b57112b53ddedbb6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this claim · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,162 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.