Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Different drought measures significantly improved maize seed grain quality relative to CK.

A claim from Economic Evaluation of Drought Resistance Measures for Maize Seed Production Based on TOPSIS Model and Combination Weighting Optimization · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different drought measures significantly improved maize seed grain quality relative to CK.

Treatment
different drought resistance measurese0
Outcome
grain qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
CKe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK, different drought resistance measures significantly improved the grain quality of seeds-production corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1385

Title

Economic Evaluation of Drought Resistance Measures for Maize Seed Production Based on TOPSIS Model and Combination Weighting Optimization

Chao Liang; Shouchao Yu; Hengjia Zhang; et al. Water 2022. doi:10.3390/w14203262

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e8cfaa8c73f2bde6146c18c9e16d5439ef9e9e656b3643d1745fe2826177f3fe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

drought · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Drought stress lowered forage quality.

    Selenium Supplementation Affects Physiological and Biochemical Processes to Improve Fodder Yield and Quality of Maize (Zea mays L.) under Water Deficit Conditions · 2016

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Water deficit significantly decreased grain weight and grain quality yield in both seasons.

    Nutritional quality of maize in response to drought stress during grain-filling stages in mediterranean climate condition · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Combined K-Zn under mild drought gave statistically the same biological yield and grain quality as well-irrigated unfertilized maize.

    Combined Application of Potassium and Zinc Improves Water Relations, Stay Green, Irrigation Water Use Efficiency, and Grain Quality of Maize under Drought Stress · 2020 · compared with well-irrigated without K-Zn fertilization

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Drought increased leaf blade NDF concentration to 628 versus 613 mg NDF/g DM.

    Effect of drought stress on in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility of corn for silage · 2020

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Root dry matter declined only in GPOK.

    Physiological and proteomic analyses of Korean F1 maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids under water-deficit stress during flowering · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    CO2 concentration and drought did not alter organic matter digestibility of maize silage.

    Effects of free air carbon dioxide enrichment and drought stress on the feed value of maize silage fed to sheep at different thermal regimes · 2012

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Drought stress did not affect uNDF concentration in upper or bottom internodes.

    Effect of drought stress on neutral detergent fiber degradation kinetics of corn for silage · 2023

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Drought significantly reduced yield traits and grain quality indices in maize and sorghum.

    Differential Physiological Responses of Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor to Drought Stress: Insights into the Ameliorative Role of Humic Acid at the Reproductive and Yield Stages · 2025

    Opposite direction

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.