Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Combined Application of Potassium and Zinc Improves Water Relations, Stay Green, Irrigation Water Use Efficiency, and Grain Quality of Maize under Drought Stress

Sajid Hussain; Muhammad Maqsood; Muhammad Ijaz; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) plays an important role in the global food security, but its production is threatened by climate change, especially drought stress. Potassium (K) and zinc (Zn) are considered useful to mitigate the negative consequences of drought stress in plants. Therefore, the objective of this two-year study was to identify the best combination of K and Zn application to improve the water relations, photosynthetic pigments, yield, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) and grain quality of maize sown under mild and severe drought stress conditions. The consisted of three drought stress levels viz. 1) well-watered as control (WW), 2) mild drought (MD) with 25 mm of potential soil moisture deficit (PSMD), 3) severe drought (SD) with 50 mm of PSMD and six K-Zn treatments: i.e. 125, 100 and 150 kg ha−1 K with 0 and 12 kg ha−1 Zn. The results indicated that K-Zn application improved the water relations and chlorophyll contents, biological yield and grain quality, irrespective of water stress treatment. The combined application of K-Zn under mild drought stress produced statistically same biological yield and grain quality as under well-irrigated without K-Zn fertilization and also produced compratively higher IWUE, biological yield and grain quality under sverer drought stress. Hence, the application of K at 150 kg ha−1 in combination with Zn at 12 kg ha−1 might be useful to improve the maize production and grain quality under drought stress. As IWUE was low in WW conditions, therefore, irrigation scheduling must be re-evaluated for optimum water use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K-Zn improved maize water relations and chlorophyll under all water stress levels.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
K-Zn applicatione0
Outcome
water relations and chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
irrespective of water stress treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K-Zn application improved the water relations and chlorophyll contents, biological yield and grain quality, irrespective of water stress treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K-Zn improved biological yield and grain quality across water stress treatments.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
K-Zn applicatione0
Outcome
biological yield and grain qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K-Zn application improved the water relations and chlorophyll contents, biological yield and grain quality, irrespective of water stress treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined K-Zn under mild drought gave statistically the same biological yield and grain quality as well-irrigated unfertilized maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combined application of K-Zn under mild drought stresse0
Outcome
biological yield and grain qualitye0
Direction
statistically samee0
Comparator
well-irrigated without K-Zn fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of K-Zn under mild drought stress produced statistically same biological yield and grain quality as under well-irrigated without K-Zn fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined K-Zn under severe drought produced higher IWUE, biological yield and grain quality.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combined application of K-Znt1
Outcome
IWUE, biological yield and grain qualitye0
Direction
compratively highere0
Qualifier
under sverer drought stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“also produced compratively higher IWUE, biological yield and grain quality under sverer drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
t1

“combined application of K-Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1052 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest 150 kg ha−1 K with 12 kg ha−1 Zn for maize production and grain quality under drought.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
application of K at 150 kg ha−1 in combination with Zn at 12 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
maize production and grain qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of K at 150 kg ha−1 in combination with Zn at 12 kg ha−1 might be useful to improve the maize production and grain quality under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1468 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IWUE was low in well-watered conditions.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
IWUEe0
Direction
lowe0
Qualifier
WW conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IWUE was low in WW conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend reevaluating irrigation scheduling for water use efficiency.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
irrigation scheduling must be re-evaluated for optimum water use efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation scheduling must be re-evaluated for optimum water use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.