Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Tora yielded up to 25% more shoot biomass than the natural clone under high fertilization and irrigation.

A claim from Evidence for increased sensitivity to nutrient and water stress in a fast-growing hybrid willow compared with a natural willow clone · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tora yielded up to 25% more shoot biomass than the natural clone under high fertilization and irrigation.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Material
Torae0
Treatment
high rates of fertilization and irrigatione0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Value
up to 25%e0
Comparator
plants of the natural clonee0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“"Tora" plants produced up to 25% more shoot biomass than plants of the natural clone in response to high rates of fertilization and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1373

Title

Evidence for increased sensitivity to nutrient and water stress in a fast-growing hybrid willow compared with a natural willow clone

M. Weih Tree Physiology 2001. doi:10.1093/treephys/21.15.1141

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e8d4971066bcf2b190f8f797951b389d35203c31b4a684689c2236173673aa7b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Irrigation did not distinctly influence root-shoot ratio.

    Root-shoot ratio in irrigated plants · 1965

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Irrigation treatment did not significantly change crop growth metrics.

    Automated Leaching Fraction-based Irrigation System Reduces Leaching, Conserves Water, and Supports Crop Growth in a Commercial Nursery · 2022 · compared with control zone

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Irrigation had no overall effect on plant size.

    Evaluation of Plant Growth and Flowering Performance of Florida Native and Non-native Ornamentals under Varying Irrigation · 2024

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Reducing irrigation frequency may not affect height and overall growth if plants are watered thoroughly each time.

    Evaluating the Effect of Fertilization and Substrate Volumetric Water Content on Compact Tomato and Pepper Plants · 2024

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    No inhibition of plant growth was registered in plants irrigated with the different wastewater mixtures.

    Phytotreatment of contaminated wastewater with energy crops · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Summer irrigation increased leaf elongation rate.

    Compensatory Growth of Tall Fescue Following Drought1 · 1979 · compared with water‐stressed

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Irrigation at 1200, 1500, and 1800 HR increased total plant dry weight by 57% relative to early morning irrigation in experiment 1.

    Timing of Low Pressure Irrigation Affects Plant Growth and Water Utilization Efficiency · 2002 · compared with plants irrigated during early morning hours

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Magnetized irrigation water increased vegetative growth in the four studied crops.

    Response of some food crops to irrigation with magnetized water under green house condition. · 2011

    Same direction

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 32 positive, 7 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Preinoculated nutrient solutions reduced plant growth after 16 days.

    Plant growth responses to bacterization with selected Pseudomonas spp. strains and rhizosphere microbial development in hydroponic cultures · 1989

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    NPK fertilization mostly did not affect germination.

    Seed Banks and Species Richness Potential of Coal Slurry Ponds Reclaimed as Wetlands · 1995

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Plants grown in nutrient-depleted compost were severely stunted in growth because essential soluble nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium) were removed.

    Development of a defined compost system for the study of plant-microbe interactions · 2020

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Fertilizer treatment was ineffective on seed germination; results are not presented.

    Physiological Responses of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria, Biochar and Chemical Fertilizer Under Salinity Stress · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Without current fertilizer, prior fertilization did not alter growth.

    Effects of cumulative fertilization pattern on growth and nutrient concentrations of Chamaecyparis obtusa seedlings · 2016 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Severe confinement with 10.55 mmol/L nitrogen gave leaf growth similar to the unconstrained 5.55 mmol/L treatment.

    NITROGEN ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF LETTUCE PLANTS GROWN UNDER ROOT CONFINEMENT · 2015 · compared with no root confinement at 5.55 mmol/L of N

    No difference from an alternative

  7. no effect
    Fertigation with N at 75 or 125 mg/L through November 28 did not increase leaf or stem dry weights compared with the same N rate applied only through September 29.

    Effects of Fall Fertilization on Freeze Resistance, Flowering, and Growth of ‘Hinodegiri’ Azalea · 2008 · compared with plants fertigated at the same N rate from August 1 to September 29

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive
    At least ten percent compost significantly improved growth versus controls.

    Biological Evaluation of Seaweed Composting · 1998 · compared with control plants

    Same direction

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.