Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Recommended fertilizer gave higher cowpea leaf chlorophyll than most other treatments.

A claim from Effect of organic manures on soil and quality parameters of cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] under middle Gujarat conditions · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended fertilizer gave higher cowpea leaf chlorophyll than most other treatments.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Recommended Dose Fertilizer (RDF) i.e. 20-40-0 NPK kg ha-1e0
Outcome
chlorophyll content of leavese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
60 DASe0
Comparator
rest of the treatments except, vermicompost 2 t ha-1 and poultry manure 2 t ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recommended Dose Fertilizer (RDF) i.e. 20-40-0 NPK kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher chlorophyll content of leaves at 60 DAS and crude protein content in green seed over rest of the treatments except, vermicompost 2 t ha-1 and poultry manure 2 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–573
t0

“cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95

Title

Effect of organic manures on soil and quality parameters of cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] under middle Gujarat conditions

Deepa Joshi; K. M. Gediya; Shivangini Gupta; et al. Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal 2016. doi:10.18805/asd.v36i3.11445

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e8e8acc4954b963d13eb79fd58e339a77f03ab5039a8f3976f58d83e701cdd24 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.