Paper · 2016 · Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal

Effect of organic manures on soil and quality parameters of cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] under middle Gujarat conditions

Deepa Joshi; K. M. Gediya; Shivangini Gupta; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was carried out on loamy sand soil to evaluate the effect of organic manures (farmyard manure, vermicompost, poultry manure, neem cake and castor cake) on soil and quality parameters of cowpea during summer season of 2014. Nine treatments were tried out in randomized block design with four replications. Recommended Dose Fertilizer (RDF) i.e. 20-40-0 NPK kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher chlorophyll content of leaves at 60 DAS and crude protein content in green seed over rest of the treatments except, vermicompost 2 t ha-1 and poultry manure 2 t ha-1. Soil chemical parameters viz., Organic Carbon (OC), EC, available N, P2O5 and K2O were found to be affected significantly due to different treatments. Higher OC content after harvest of the crop was reported under treatment Poultry manure 2 t ha-1. Whereas, treatment vermicompost @ 2 t ha-1 recorded significantly reduction in EC over control, however, different treatments failed to exert their significant influence on soil pH after harvest of the crop. Significantly higher values of available nutrients (N, P2O5 and K2O) in the soil after harvest of the crop was observed under the treatment VC 2 t ha-1, FYM 2.5 t ha-1 and PM 2 t ha-1, respectively. RDF 20-40-0 kg NPK ha-1 recorded the maximum value of net realization with BCR value followed by treatment PM 2 t ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended fertilizer gave higher cowpea leaf chlorophyll than most other treatments.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Recommended Dose Fertilizer (RDF) i.e. 20-40-0 NPK kg ha-1e0
Outcome
chlorophyll content of leavese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
60 DASe0
Comparator
rest of the treatments except, vermicompost 2 t ha-1 and poultry manure 2 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recommended Dose Fertilizer (RDF) i.e. 20-40-0 NPK kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher chlorophyll content of leaves at 60 DAS and crude protein content in green seed over rest of the treatments except, vermicompost 2 t ha-1 and poultry manure 2 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended fertilizer gave higher cowpea green seed crude protein than most other treatments.

Organ / stage
green seede0
Treatment
Recommended Dose Fertilizer (RDF) i.e. 20-40-0 NPK kg ha-1e0
Outcome
crude protein content in green seede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rest of the treatments except, vermicompost 2 t ha-1 and poultry manure 2 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recommended Dose Fertilizer (RDF) i.e. 20-40-0 NPK kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher chlorophyll content of leaves at 60 DAS and crude protein content in green seed over rest of the treatments except, vermicompost 2 t ha-1 and poultry manure 2 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure gave higher postharvest soil organic carbon.

Treatment
Poultry manure 2 t ha-1e0
Outcome
OC contente0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher OC content after harvest of the crop was reported under treatment Poultry manure 2 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost reduced postharvest soil electrical conductivity relative to control.

Treatment
vermicompost @ 2 t ha-1e0
Outcome
ECe0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment vermicompost @ 2 t ha-1 recorded significantly reduction in EC over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure treatments did not significantly alter postharvest soil pH.

Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
soil pHe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different treatments failed to exert their significant influence on soil pH after harvest of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost gave significantly higher postharvest available soil nitrogen.

Treatment
VC 2 t ha-1e0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher values of available nutrients (N, P2O5 and K2O) in the soil after harvest of the crop was observed under the treatment VC 2 t ha-1, FYM 2.5 t ha-1 and PM 2 t ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure gave significantly higher postharvest available soil phosphorus.

Treatment
FYM 2.5 t ha-1e0
Outcome
P2O5e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher values of available nutrients (N, P2O5 and K2O) in the soil after harvest of the crop was observed under the treatment VC 2 t ha-1, FYM 2.5 t ha-1 and PM 2 t ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure gave significantly higher postharvest available soil potassium.

Treatment
PM 2 t ha-1e0
Outcome
K2Oe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher values of available nutrients (N, P2O5 and K2O) in the soil after harvest of the crop was observed under the treatment VC 2 t ha-1, FYM 2.5 t ha-1 and PM 2 t ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended fertilizer produced the maximum net realization and BCR.

Treatment
RDF 20-40-0 kg NPK ha-1e0
Outcome
net realization with BCR valuee0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
PM 2 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF 20-40-0 kg NPK ha-1 recorded the maximum value of net realization with BCR value followed by treatment PM 2 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea[Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–95 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 33 positive, 2 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.