Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Medicago sativa with 10 g peat per kg soil had significantly improved soluble protein compared with the other treatment.

A claim from The Response of the Peat Improved Open Pit Mine Topsoil Alternative Materials for Medicago Sativa · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medicago sativa with 10 g peat per kg soil had significantly improved soluble protein compared with the other treatment.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
added content at 10 g peat·kg-1e1
Outcome
soluble proteine2
Direction
significantly improvede2
Comparator
other treatmente2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“takes Medicago sativa and uses peat as the selected crop and amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–166
e1

“the indexes of height growth,growth rate,biomass,leaf SPAD value are higher than the other treatments with the added content at 10 g peat·kg-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–795
e2

“the indexes of the cell membrane permeability,SOD activity,POD activity,soluble protein are significantly improved compared with the other treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–953

Title

The Response of the Peat Improved Open Pit Mine Topsoil Alternative Materials for Medicago Sativa

Wei Bei-le Nongye huanjing kexue xuebao 2013

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e8f0d1a32cb2d020ea4f585ef58cd97533734be49129b1d0e2095f7436fd0cfe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

growing medium · physiology: osmolytes · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.