Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing mushroom substrate while decreasing slurry lowered soluble sugar in the ryegrass–alfalfa mixture.

A claim from The Effect of Spent Mushroom Substrate and Cow Slurry on Sugar Content and Digestibility of Alfalfa Grass Mixtures · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mushroom substrate while decreasing slurry lowered soluble sugar in the ryegrass–alfalfa mixture.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass and hybrid alfalfae0
Treatment
increasing doses of mushroom substrate with decreasing doses of slurrye0
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
lowerede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“In the mixture of perennial ryegrass and hybrid alfalfa increasing doses of mushroom substrate with decreasing doses of slurry lowered soluble sugar content and digestibility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1127

Title

The Effect of Spent Mushroom Substrate and Cow Slurry on Sugar Content and Digestibility of Alfalfa Grass Mixtures

E. Malinowska; K. Jankowski International Journal of Agronomy 2020. doi:10.1155/2020/3251742

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-aff6dac4c8f63a0ae9269755841724848cfb1060c77b8690a02a1eece798acc9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

growing medium · physiology: osmolytes · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.