Paper · 1981 · Crop Science

Release of Soluble Protein and Nitrogen in Alfalfa. II. Infleunce of Potassium and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Three Cultivars1

R. P. Walgenbach; G. C. Marten

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Reduced incidence of ruminant bloat was reported on legume pastures fertilized with high levels of potassium (K) or K plus nitrogen (N). Amount of soluble protein released from alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) into sodium maleate buffer (pH 6.9) was proposed as possible estimate of ruminant bloat potential in comparative studies. Our objective was to determine whether K and N fertilization would influence concentration of several N fractions released from alfalfa. ‘Ramsey,’ ‘Saranac,’ and ‘520’ alfalfa cultivars were fertillzed in the fall with 0 (control), 350, and 700 kg as K 2 SO 4 /ha and in the following spring with these same levels of N as NH4NO(3 4 3 × 3 factorial). The upper 10 to 15 cm of told‐bud stage alfalfa in first and second crops was analyzed for several N fractions. As N applied increased, mean concentrations of total N (TN), total soluble N (TSN), soluble nonprotein (SNPN), and soluble protein N (SPN) increasedm first‐harvest herbage. Mean concentrations of SPN increased 10.8% at 300 kg N/ha and 13.3% at 700 kg over that in alfalfa not fertilized with N. As the K level increased, mean concentrations of TN, TSN, and SNPN decreased in first‐harvest herbage. Fertilization with K did not affect concentration of SPN. Mean concentrations of TN, TSN, and SNPN in Saranac and TN, TSN, and SPN in 520 first‐harvest herbage were slightly but significantly greater than those in Ramsey. Cultivars did not affect concentrations of N fractions in secondharvest herbage. We found no evidence that fertilization of alfalfa with K or N reduced its apparent bloat potential, as estimated by SPN release. Instead, we showed that alfalfa fertilized with high levels of N had a slightly increased apparent bloat potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased total N, total soluble N, soluble nonprotein N, and soluble protein N in first-harvest alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
N appliede0
Outcome
mean concentrations of total N (TN), total soluble N (TSN), soluble nonprotein (SNPN), and soluble protein N (SPN)e0
Direction
increasedme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As N applied increased, mean concentrations of total N (TN), total soluble N (TSN), soluble nonprotein (SNPN), and soluble protein N (SPN) increasedm first‐harvest herbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble protein N rose 10.8% at 300 kg N/ha relative to unfertilized alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
300 kg N/hae0
Outcome
Mean concentrations of SPNe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.8%e0
Comparator
alfalfa not fertilized with Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean concentrations of SPN increased 10.8% at 300 kg N/ha and 13.3% at 700 kg over that in alfalfa not fertilized with N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble protein N rose 13.3% at 700 kg N/ha relative to unfertilized alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
700 kge0
Outcome
Mean concentrations of SPNe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.3%e0
Comparator
alfalfa not fertilized with Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean concentrations of SPN increased 10.8% at 300 kg N/ha and 13.3% at 700 kg over that in alfalfa not fertilized with N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium reduced total N, total soluble N, and soluble nonprotein N in first-harvest alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
K levele0
Outcome
mean concentrations of TN, TSN, and SNPNe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As the K level increased, mean concentrations of TN, TSN, and SNPN decreased in first‐harvest herbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilization did not change soluble protein N concentration.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
Fertilization with Ke0
Outcome
concentration of SPNe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with K did not affect concentration of SPN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1246 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–206 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saranac exceeded Ramsey for first-harvest total N, total soluble N, and soluble nonprotein N.

Material
Saranace0
Outcome
Mean concentrations of TN, TSN, and SNPNe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Ramseye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Mean concentrations of TN, TSN, and SNPN in Saranac and TN, TSN, and SPN in 520 first‐harvest herbage were slightly but significantly greater than those in Ramsey”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1410 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

520 exceeded Ramsey for first-harvest total N, total soluble N, and soluble protein N.

Material
520e0
Outcome
TN, TSN, and SPNe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Ramseye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Mean concentrations of TN, TSN, and SNPN in Saranac and TN, TSN, and SPN in 520 first‐harvest herbage were slightly but significantly greater than those in Ramsey”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1410 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars did not differ in second-harvest nitrogen fractions.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
concentrations of N fractionse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars did not affect concentrations of N fractions in secondharvest herbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1491 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither potassium nor nitrogen fertilization reduced apparent bloat potential as estimated by soluble protein N release.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
fertilization of alfalfa with K or Ne0
Outcome
apparent bloat potentiale0
Direction
no evidencee0
Qualifier
as estimated by SPN releasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We found no evidence that fertilization of alfalfa with K or N reduced its apparent bloat potential, as estimated by SPN release”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen fertilization slightly increased apparent bloat potential.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
high levels of Ne0
Outcome
apparent bloat potentiale0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alfalfa fertilized with high levels of N had a slightly increased apparent bloat potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1737 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: osmolytes · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.