Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rotation had higher wheat grain yield than monoculture, at 781 kg/ha.

A claim from The influence of rainfall and tillage on wheat yield parameters and weed population in monoculture versus rotation systems · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation had higher wheat grain yield than monoculture, at 781 kg/ha.

Treatment
rotation systeme0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
781 kg/hae0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rotation system presented higher values of wheat grain yield (781 kg/ha) and dry straw biomass (1803 kg/ha) but also weed biomass (48.54 g m −2 ) compared to monoculture (27.50 g m −2 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1443

Title

The influence of rainfall and tillage on wheat yield parameters and weed population in monoculture versus rotation systems

María Luisa Gandía; Juan Pablo Del Monte; José Luis Tenorio; et al. Scientific Reports 2021. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-00934-y

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e91f2e88c3b41bb20a9aea71f8ca119cd13f6bed87af72b7f4ddf2c75e0c0a62 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this claim · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

336 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.