Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation treatments did not affect white rot incidence in apple.

A claim from Evaporative Cooling Irrigation Influences Disease, Insect, and Mite Pests of ‘Delicious’ Apples1 · 1981

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation treatments did not affect white rot incidence in apple.

Treatment
Irrigation treatmentse3
Outcome
white rot incidencee3
Direction
did not affecte3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pests of ‘Delicious’ apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–164
e3

“Irrigation treatments did not affect white rot incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–500

Title

Evaporative Cooling Irrigation Influences Disease, Insect, and Mite Pests of ‘Delicious’ Apples1

Brenda Olcott-Reid; Turner B. Sutton; C. R. Unrath Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1981. doi:10.21273/jashs.106.4.469

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e934757bd9b816080b7ff4e5c32d1c2f4fbbcc7f1cf891ededde814891220b39 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.