Abstract
The energized water, Bio-Green Water (B.G. Water) was manufactured through a series of processes: water purification → adding catalysts → exposure with special energy spectra → filtering, by Kyungwon Enterprise Co. B.G. Water was treated with irrigation of 4 liters/tree at 30 Apr. 1994 and 8 liters/tree at 20 June 1994 in the `Fuji' apple orchard soil, and a pasting to the trunk of apple trees at 20 Apr. 1994. In terms of orchard soil property, Ca and Mg contents were outstandingly increased; however, P 2 O 5 was decreased and K 2 O was not influenced by irrigation of B.G. Water. The B.G. Water treatment changed soil pH from 4.71 to 5.81 of surface soil level (0 to 20 cm) and from 4.82 to 6.45 of deeper soil level (30 to 50 cm). B.G. Water treatment showed higher soluble solids in apple fruit juice, and lower flesh browning after peeling than that of control. Of mineral contents in fruit skin, Ca was increased; however, N was decreased by the B.G. Water treatment. Of the four solvents fraction for Ca extraction, water-soluble Ca content was increased in the fruit skin treated with B.G. Water, whereas the contents of N, P, Ca, Zn, and B were decreased in the leaves and stem bark of apple trees treated with B.G. Water.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-Green Water irrigation increased orchard soil Ca and Mg content.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- irrigation of B.G. Watere0
- Outcome
- Ca and Mg contentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ca and Mg contents were outstandingly increased; however, P 2 O 5 was decreased and K 2 O was not influenced by irrigation of B.G. Water”
t0“apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-Green Water irrigation decreased orchard soil P 2 O 5.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- irrigation of B.G. Watere0
- Outcome
- P 2 O 5e0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P 2 O 5 was decreased and K 2 O was not influenced by irrigation of B.G. Water”
t0“apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-Green Water irrigation did not change orchard soil K 2 O.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- irrigation of B.G. Watere0
- Outcome
- K 2 Oe0
- Direction
- not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“K 2 O was not influenced by irrigation of B.G. Water”
t0“apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-Green Water increased surface soil pH from 4.71 to 5.81.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- B.G. Water treatmente0
- Outcome
- soil pHe0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 4.71 to 5.81e0
- Qualifier
- surface soil level (0 to 20 cm)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“B.G. Water treatment changed soil pH from 4.71 to 5.81 of surface soil level (0 to 20 cm)”
t0“apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-Green Water increased deeper soil pH from 4.82 to 6.45.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- B.G. Watere0
- Outcome
- soil pHe0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 4.82 to 6.45e0
- Qualifier
- deeper soil level (30 to 50 cm)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“B.G. Water treatment changed soil pH from 4.71 to 5.81 of surface soil level (0 to 20 cm) and from 4.82 to 6.45 of deeper soil level (30 to 50 cm)”
t0“apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-Green Water increased apple juice soluble solids relative to control.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- B.G. Water treatmente0
- Outcome
- soluble solids in apple fruit juicee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“B.G. Water treatment showed higher soluble solids in apple fruit juice, and lower flesh browning after peeling than that of control”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-Green Water lowered peeled apple flesh browning relative to control.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- B.G. Water treatmente0
- Outcome
- flesh browning after peelinge0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“B.G. Water treatment showed higher soluble solids in apple fruit juice, and lower flesh browning after peeling than that of control”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-Green Water increased Ca in fruit skin.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticat0
- Organ / stage
- fruit skine0
- Treatment
- B.G. Water treatmente0
- Outcome
- Cae0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Of mineral contents in fruit skin, Ca was increased; however, N was decreased by the B.G. Water treatment”
t0“apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-Green Water decreased N in fruit skin.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticat0
- Organ / stage
- fruit skine0
- Treatment
- B.G. Water treatmente0
- Outcome
- Ne0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Of mineral contents in fruit skin, Ca was increased; however, N was decreased by the B.G. Water treatment”
t0“apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-Green Water increased water-soluble Ca in fruit skin.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticat0
- Organ / stage
- fruit skine0
- Treatment
- B.G. Watere0
- Outcome
- water-soluble Ca contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“water-soluble Ca content was increased in the fruit skin treated with B.G. Water”
t0“apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-Green Water decreased N, P and Ca in apple leaves and stem bark.
- Taxon
- apple treesMalus domesticae0
- Organ / stage
- leaves and stem barke0
- Treatment
- B.G. Watere0
- Outcome
- contents of N, P, Cae0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“contents of N, P, Ca, Zn, and B were decreased in the leaves and stem bark of apple trees treated with B.G. Water”
Claim · model-written summary
Bio-Green Water decreased Zn and B in apple leaves and stem bark.
- Taxon
- apple treesMalus domesticae0
- Organ / stage
- leaves and stem barke0
- Treatment
- B.G. Watere0
- Outcome
- Zn, and Be0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“contents of N, P, Ca, Zn, and B were decreased in the leaves and stem bark of apple trees treated with B.G. Water”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →irrigation · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →irrigation · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.