Paper · 1998 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Using Soil Solution Monitoring to Determine the Effects of Irrigation Management and Fertigation on Nitrogen Availability in High-density Apple Orchards

D. Neilsen; P. Parchomchuk; G.H. Neilsen; et al.

16
claims
33
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Direct application of fertilizers in irrigation water (fertigation) is an efficient method of supplying nutrients to fruit trees. Information is needed on the relationship between irrigation and N inputs on N availability in order to target nutrient applications to meet plant demands. Soil solution was collected from permanently installed suction lysimeters and NO 3- N concentration was measured over the growing season in three experiments: 1) comparison of sprinkler irrigation + broadcast fertilizer with weekly fertigation + daily drip irrigation; 2) comparison of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 or Ca(NO 3 ) 2 as N sources under daily fertigation; and 3) comparisons of combinations of irrigation applied at either fixed rates or to meet evaporative demand and fertilizer (Ca(NO 3 ) 2 ) applied daily either at fixed rates or to maintain a given concentration in the fertigation solution in two soil types—loamy sand and silt loam. Trials are located in high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple ( Malus × domestica Borkh.) on M.9 rootstock. Nitrate-N concentration in the soil solution measured at 30 cm deep remained higher, over more of the growing season, for weekly fertigation + daily drip irrigation than for a single broadcast fertilizer application + sprinkler irrigation. With daily Ca(NO 3 ) 2 fertigation, soil solution NO 3- N concentrations increased and decreased rapidly with the onset and end of fertigation respectively, remained relatively constant during the intervening period and were directly proportional to either the amount of N or the amount of irrigation water added. Daily fertigation with (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 resulted in less control of NO 3- N availability in the root-zone than with Ca(NO 3 ) 2 , which may be problematic for precise timing of N nutrition. Except for the fixed irrigation rate applied to the loamy sand soil, soil solution NO 3- N concentrations at 30 cm beneath the emitter were similar to average concentrations in the fertigating solution, for all methods of irrigation management in both soil types. Elevated NO 3- N concentrations in soil solution below the root zone (75 cm deep) were detected in the loamy sand regardless of methods of N application and irrigation although there was some evidence of less leaching to this depth, under scheduled irrigation. In the silt loam soil, considerably lower concentrations of NO 3- N were found beneath the root zone than at 30 cm deep for all of irrigation procedures and frequently there was insufficient water moving to 75 cm to provide sample. Tree growth in the loamy sand was less than in the silt loam soil; was limited by low application of irrigation water in 1992 and 1993; was unaffected by NO 3- N concentration in the root zone, indicating that N inputs could be minimized by adding N to maintain concentrations of 75 μg·mL -1 or possibly less. Nitrogen inputs may also be reduced if fertilizer N and irrigation water could be retained within the root zone. For coarse-textured soils this will require precise additions of water and possibly soil amendments to improve water holding capacity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly fertigation with daily drip irrigation kept soil solution nitrate-N higher over more of the growing season than a single broadcast application with sprinkler irrigation in apple orchards.

Treatment
weekly fertigation + daily drip irrigatione1
Outcome
Nitrate-N concentration in the soil solutione1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
over more of the growing seasone1
Comparator
a single broadcast fertilizer application + sprinkler irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrate-N concentration in the soil solution measured at 30 cm deep remained higher, over more of the growing season, for weekly fertigation + daily drip irrigation than for a single broadcast fertilizer application + sprinkler irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily Ca(NO3)2 fertigation increased soil solution NO3-N concentrations with the onset of fertigation.

Treatment
daily Ca(NO 3 ) 2 fertigatione2
Outcome
soil solution NO 3- N concentrationse2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
with the onset and end of fertigatione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e2

“With daily Ca(NO 3 ) 2 fertigation, soil solution NO 3- N concentrations increased and decreased rapidly with the onset and end of fertigation respectively, remained relatively constant during the intervening period and were directly proportional to either the amount of N or the amount of irrigation water added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil solution NO3-N concentrations decreased rapidly with the end of Ca(NO3)2 fertigation.

Treatment
daily Ca(NO 3 ) 2 fertigatione2
Outcome
soil solution NO 3- N concentrationse2
Direction
decreased rapidlye2
Qualifier
with the onset and end of fertigatione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e2

“With daily Ca(NO 3 ) 2 fertigation, soil solution NO 3- N concentrations increased and decreased rapidly with the onset and end of fertigation respectively, remained relatively constant during the intervening period and were directly proportional to either the amount of N or the amount of irrigation water added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil solution NO3-N concentrations remained relatively constant during the intervening period of daily Ca(NO3)2 fertigation.

Treatment
daily Ca(NO 3 ) 2 fertigatione2
Outcome
soil solution NO 3- N concentrationse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Qualifier
during the intervening periode2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e2

“With daily Ca(NO 3 ) 2 fertigation, soil solution NO 3- N concentrations increased and decreased rapidly with the onset and end of fertigation respectively, remained relatively constant during the intervening period and were directly proportional to either the amount of N or the amount of irrigation water added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1608 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil solution NO3-N concentrations were directly proportional to the amount of N added.

Treatment
amount of Ne2
Outcome
soil solution NO 3- N concentrationse2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Qualifier
directly proportionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e2

“With daily Ca(NO 3 ) 2 fertigation, soil solution NO 3- N concentrations increased and decreased rapidly with the onset and end of fertigation respectively, remained relatively constant during the intervening period and were directly proportional to either the amount of N or the amount of irrigation water added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1608 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil solution NO3-N concentrations were directly proportional to the amount of irrigation water added.

Treatment
amount of irrigation watere2
Outcome
soil solution NO 3- N concentrationse2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Qualifier
directly proportionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e2

“With daily Ca(NO 3 ) 2 fertigation, soil solution NO 3- N concentrations increased and decreased rapidly with the onset and end of fertigation respectively, remained relatively constant during the intervening period and were directly proportional to either the amount of N or the amount of irrigation water added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily fertigation with (NH4)2SO4 gave less control of root-zone NO3-N availability than Ca(NO3)2 fertigation in apple.

Treatment
Daily fertigation with (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4e3
Outcome
control of NO 3- N availability in the root-zonee3
Direction
lesse3
Comparator
Ca(NO 3 ) 2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e3

“Daily fertigation with (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 resulted in less control of NO 3- N availability in the root-zone than with Ca(NO 3 ) 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil solution NO3-N concentrations at 30 cm beneath the emitter were similar to the average concentrations in the fertigating solution across irrigation management methods, except at the fixed rate on loamy sand.

Treatment
methods of irrigation managemente4
Outcome
soil solution NO 3- N concentrations at 30 cm beneath the emittere4
Direction
similare4
Qualifier
Except for the fixed irrigation rate applied to the loamy sand soile4
Comparator
average concentrations in the fertigating solutione4
Setting
both soil typese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e4

“Except for the fixed irrigation rate applied to the loamy sand soil, soil solution NO 3- N concentrations at 30 cm beneath the emitter were similar to average concentrations in the fertigating solution, for all methods of irrigation management in both soil types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–2060 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO3-N concentrations below the root zone (75 cm deep) were elevated in the loamy sand regardless of N application and irrigation methods.

Outcome
NO 3- N concentrations in soil solution below the root zone (75 cm deep)e5
Qualifier
regardless of methods of N application and irrigatione5
Setting
loamy sande5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e5

“Elevated NO 3- N concentrations in soil solution below the root zone (75 cm deep) were detected in the loamy sand regardless of methods of N application and irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2062–2229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In silt loam soil, NO3-N concentrations beneath the root zone were considerably lower than at 30 cm deep for all irrigation procedures.

Treatment
irrigation procedurese6
Outcome
concentrations of NO 3- Ne6
Direction
lowere6
Comparator
at 30 cm deepe6
Setting
silt loam soile6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e6

“In the silt loam soil, considerably lower concentrations of NO 3- N were found beneath the root zone than at 30 cm deep for all of irrigation procedures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2323–2475 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree growth in the loamy sand was less than in the silt loam soil.

Outcome
Tree growthe7
Direction
lesse7
Comparator
silt loam soile7
Setting
loamy sande7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e7

“Tree growth in the loamy sand was less than in the silt loam soil; was limited by low application of irrigation water in 1992 and 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2555–2689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree growth was limited by low irrigation water application in 1992 and 1993.

Treatment
low application of irrigation watere7
Outcome
Tree growthe7
Direction
limitede7
Setting
1992 and 1993e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e7

“Tree growth in the loamy sand was less than in the silt loam soil; was limited by low application of irrigation water in 1992 and 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2555–2689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree growth was unaffected by NO3-N concentration in the root zone.

Treatment
NO 3- N concentration in the root zonee1
Outcome
Tree growthe7
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e7

“Tree growth in the loamy sand was less than in the silt loam soil; was limited by low application of irrigation water in 1992 and 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2555–2689 · show in text ↑
e1

“was unaffected by NO 3- N concentration in the root zone, indicating that N inputs could be minimized by adding N to maintain concentrations of 75 μg·mL -1 or possibly less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2691–2863 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N inputs in apple could be minimized by adding N to maintain NO3-N concentrations of 75 μg·mL -1 or possibly less.

Outcome
N inputs could be minimizede1
Value
75 μg·mL -1e1
Qualifier
maintain concentrations of 75 μg·mL -1 or possibly lesse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e1

“was unaffected by NO 3- N concentration in the root zone, indicating that N inputs could be minimized by adding N to maintain concentrations of 75 μg·mL -1 or possibly less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2691–2863 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen inputs in apple may be reduced if fertilizer N and irrigation water are retained within the root zone.

Outcome
Nitrogen inputs may also be reducede2
Qualifier
if fertilizer N and irrigation water could be retained within the root zonee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e2

“Nitrogen inputs may also be reduced if fertilizer N and irrigation water could be retained within the root zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2865–2976 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Coarse-textured soils under apple will require precise water additions and possibly soil amendments to improve water holding capacity.

Outcome
precise additions of water and possibly soil amendmentse3
Qualifier
to improve water holding capacitye3
Setting
coarse-textured soilse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high density apple plantings of either `Gala' or `Empire' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1009 · show in text ↑
e3

“For coarse-textured soils this will require precise additions of water and possibly soil amendments to improve water holding capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2978–3111 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

51 papers: 37 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

irrigation · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

67 papers: 52 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

fertilization · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 86 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.