Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A combination of these treatments with an effective calcium spray programme could result in large increases in fruit calcium concentration.

A claim from The effects of environment and cultural practices on calcium concentration in the apple fruit · 1979

Intervention effecthypothesisoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

A combination of these treatments with an effective calcium spray programme could result in large increases in fruit calcium concentration.

Treatment
the combination of all these treatments, and an effective calcium spray programmee1
Outcome
calcium concentrationse1
Direction
increasese1
Value
from 35 up to 60 ppm fresh weighte1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“calcium concentration in the apple fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93
e1

“the combination of all these treatments, and an effective calcium spray programme could result in large increases (eg from 35 up to 60 ppm fresh weight) in calcium concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1386

Title

The effects of environment and cultural practices on calcium concentration in the apple fruit

M. A. Perring Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 1979. doi:10.1080/00103627909366894

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-aaf1bbce2e94e7d7f18c0b40862cd30ac3d2293b62614eb7359f4a886c46b0c6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

51 papers: 37 positive, 14 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 100 positive, 16 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.