Intervention effectmodel-written summary

First-cycle selection significantly increased green weed weight by 9.59% under glyphosate treatment.

A claim from Competition Indicator in Alfalfa Populations Following Recurrent Selection to Glyphosate Tolerance · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

First-cycle selection significantly increased green weed weight by 9.59% under glyphosate treatment.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
first cycle of selection to glyphosate tolerancee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
green and dry weed weightse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9.59e0
Comparator
base populatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The first cycle of selection to glyphosate tolerance expressed a significant increase of 9.59 and 10.93% relative to the base population as green and dry weed weights, when evaluated under glyphosate treating condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1627
e1

“alfalfa populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–227

Title

Competition Indicator in Alfalfa Populations Following Recurrent Selection to Glyphosate Tolerance

M. Abd El-Sattar Ahmed; Ahlam H. Mostafa; Thanaa I. Milad; et al. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2020. doi:10.21608/alexja.2020.97565

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-e9660e1e23631b06136b9cbb507a9e21057dd3c6ec481f6304b6d8e45f0e82d2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · weed · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.