Intervention effectmodel-written summary

High NPK fertilizer level had no significant effect on monopodia per plant, seed index, lint and fiber properties of cotton.

A claim from EFFECT OF WATER STRESS AND FOLIAR FEEDING WITH BORON AND ZINC UNDER NPK FERTILIZER LEVELS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF THE NEW PROMISING COTTON GENOTYPE (GIZA 86 X 10229) · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High NPK fertilizer level had no significant effect on monopodia per plant, seed index, lint and fiber properties of cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
high NPK fertilizer levele2
Outcome
monopodia/plant, seed index, lint presenting and fiber propertiese1
Direction
did not exhibit significant effecte1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193
e1

“did not exhibit significant effect on no.of monopodia/plant, seed index, lint presenting and fiber properties under studyin both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1970–2106
e2

“the high NPK fertilizer level (90 kg N + 37.5kg P2O5 + 48 kg K2O/fed.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1705

Title

EFFECT OF WATER STRESS AND FOLIAR FEEDING WITH BORON AND ZINC UNDER NPK FERTILIZER LEVELS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF THE NEW PROMISING COTTON GENOTYPE (GIZA 86 X 10229)

M.A.A. Emara; Amal Abdel-Aal; S. A.F. Hamoda Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development 2015. doi:10.21608/fjard.2015.191766

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e969960fd76535e4c0ba39ba2882ff9ddf1fbac015bde9a2eab9331be69622b6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 82 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 82 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

120 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.