Paper · 2015 · Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development

EFFECT OF WATER STRESS AND FOLIAR FEEDING WITH BORON AND ZINC UNDER NPK FERTILIZER LEVELS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF THE NEW PROMISING COTTON GENOTYPE (GIZA 86 X 10229)

M.A.A. Emara; Amal Abdel-Aal; S. A.F. Hamoda

20
claims
49
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons to study the effect of waterstress and foliar feeding with boron and zinc under NPK fertilizer levels ongrowth, earliness, yield, yield components and some fiber quality. Eachexperiment was laid out in a split split-plot design with four replications. Themain plots involved three irrigation intervals (two weeks, three weeks and fourweeks) throughout the growing season. The sub-plots were allocated to threeNPK levels (60 kg N + 22.5 kg P2O5 + 24 kg K2O/fed; 75 kg N + 30 kg P2O5 + 36 kgK2O/fed and 90 kg N + 37.5 kg P2O5 + 48 kg K2O/fed ) The sub sub-plots involvedfour foliar feeding treatments with boron and zinc(control (without foliarapplication), foliar application of Zn-EDTA, foliar application of B-EDTA. andfoliar application of Zn-EDTA + B-EDTA). The timing of foliar applicationswere at the start and peak of flowering stages.The most important results obtained could be summarized as follows:1) The obtained results revealed that increasing irrigation intervals to four weekssignificantly decreased days to first flower, plant height at harvest, no. of fruitingbranches/plant, no. of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fed. inboth seasons and days to first open boll in one season only. While, irrigationintervals did not exhibit significant effect on no. of monopodia/plant, first fruitingnode, earliness %, seed index, lint presenting and fiber properties under study.2) The obtained results revealed that the high NPK fertilizer level (90 kg N + 37.5kg P2O5 + 48 kg K2O/fed.) significantly increased first fruiting node, days to firstflower and first open boll, plant height at harvest, no. of fruiting branches/plant,no. of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fed and significantlydecreased earliness % in both seasons and did not exhibit significant effect on no.of monopodia/plant, seed index, lint presenting and fiber properties under studyin both seasons.3) The obtained results revealed that foliar feeding with boron and zinc mixturesignificantly increased no. of fruiting branches/plant, no. of open bolls/plant, bollweight and seed cotton yield/fed. While, micronutrients treatments did not exhibitsignificant effect on plant height at harvest, no. of monopodia/plant, first fruitingnode, days to first flower and first open boll, earliness %, seed index, lintpresenting and fiber properties under study in both seasons.4) The interaction between irrigation intervals and NPK fertilizer levelssignificantly affected days to first flower, plant height at harvest, earliness%, no.of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fed in both seasons and no.of fruiting branches/plant in one season only and did not exhibit significant effecton first fruiting node, days to first open boll, seed index, lint presenting and fiberproperties under study in both seasons. 5) The interaction between NPK fertilizer levels and foliar feeding with somemicronutrients treatments significantly affected no. of open bolls/plant and seedcotton yield/fed in one season and no. of fruiting branches/plant and earliness %in both seasons and did not exhibit a significant effect on the other traits understudy in both seasons.6) The interaction between irrigation intervals, NPK fertilizer levels and foliarfeeding with some micronutrients treatments had a significant effect on no. offruiting branches/plant and no. of open bolls/plant in 2013 season only and bollweight and seed cotton yield/fed in both seasons. While, did not exhibitsignificant effect on the other traits under study in both seasons.Generally, results obtained revealed that irrigation every two weeks incombination with the high NPK fertilizer level (90 kg N + 37.5 kg P2O5 + 48 kgK2O/fed.) and foliar feeding with Zn and B mixture (2 g from each element/Lwater) at the start and peak of flowering stages for obtaining high productivity ofthe new promising genotype cotton (Giza 86 x 10229) under this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every four weeks significantly decreased days to first flower, plant height and fruiting branches per plant in cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
irrigation intervals to four weekse1
Outcome
days to first flower, plant height at harvest, no. of fruiting branches/plante1
Direction
decreasede1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing irrigation intervals to four weeks significantly decreased days to first flower, plant height at harvest, no. of fruiting branches/plant”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1140–1285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every four weeks significantly decreased number of open bolls per plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
increasing irrigation intervals to four weekse2
Outcome
no. of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fede1
Direction
decreasede1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly decreased days to first flower, plant height at harvest, no. of fruiting branches/plant, no. of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fed”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1185–1349 · show in text ↑
e2

“increasing irrigation intervals to four weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation every four weeks significantly decreased days to first open boll in one season only.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
increasing irrigation intervals to four weekse2
Outcome
days to first open bolle1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
in one season onlye1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly decreased days to first flower, plant height at harvest, no. of fruiting branches/plant, no. of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fed. inboth seasons and days to first open boll in one season only”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1185–1412 · show in text ↑
e2

“increasing irrigation intervals to four weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation intervals had no significant effect on number of monopodia per plant, first fruiting node or earliness percentage in cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
irrigation intervalse1
Outcome
no. of monopodia/plant, first fruiting node, earliness %e1
Direction
did not exhibit significant effecte1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“While, irrigation intervals did not exhibit significant effect on no. of monopodia/plant, first fruiting node, earliness %”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1414–1534 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation intervals had no significant effect on seed index, lint percentage and fiber properties of cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
irrigation intervalse1
Outcome
seed index, lint presenting and fiber propertiese1
Direction
did not exhibit significant effecte1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation intervals did not exhibit significant effect on no. of monopodia/plant, first fruiting node, earliness %, seed index, lint presenting and fiber properties”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1421–1584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High NPK fertilizer level significantly increased first fruiting node, days to first flower and days to first open boll in cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
high NPK fertilizer levele2
Outcome
first fruiting node, days to first flower and first open bolle1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly increased first fruiting node, days to first flower and first open boll”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1706–1790 · show in text ↑
e2

“the high NPK fertilizer level (90 kg N + 37.5kg P2O5 + 48 kg K2O/fed.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High NPK fertilizer level significantly increased plant height, fruiting branches and open bolls per plant in cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
high NPK fertilizer levele2
Outcome
plant height at harvest, no. of fruiting branches/plant, no. of open bolls/plante1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly increased first fruiting node, days to first flower and first open boll, plant height at harvest, no. of fruiting branches/plant, no. of open bolls/plant”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1706–1871 · show in text ↑
e2

“the high NPK fertilizer level (90 kg N + 37.5kg P2O5 + 48 kg K2O/fed.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High NPK fertilizer level significantly increased boll weight and seed cotton yield in cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
high NPK fertilizer levele2
Outcome
boll weight and seed cotton yield/fede1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly increased first fruiting node, days to first flower and first open boll, plant height at harvest, no. of fruiting branches/plant, no. of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fed”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1706–1910 · show in text ↑
e2

“the high NPK fertilizer level (90 kg N + 37.5kg P2O5 + 48 kg K2O/fed.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High NPK fertilizer level significantly decreased earliness percentage in cotton in both seasons.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
high NPK fertilizer levele2
Outcome
earliness %e1
Direction
decreasede1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreased earliness % in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–1965 · show in text ↑
e2

“the high NPK fertilizer level (90 kg N + 37.5kg P2O5 + 48 kg K2O/fed.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High NPK fertilizer level had no significant effect on monopodia per plant, seed index, lint and fiber properties of cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
high NPK fertilizer levele2
Outcome
monopodia/plant, seed index, lint presenting and fiber propertiese1
Direction
did not exhibit significant effecte1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“did not exhibit significant effect on no.of monopodia/plant, seed index, lint presenting and fiber properties under studyin both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1970–2106 · show in text ↑
e2

“the high NPK fertilizer level (90 kg N + 37.5kg P2O5 + 48 kg K2O/fed.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron and zinc mixture significantly increased fruiting branches, open bolls and boll weight in cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
foliar feeding with boron and zinc mixturee2
Outcome
no. of fruiting branches/plant, no. of open bolls/plant, bollweighte1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly increased no. of fruiting branches/plant, no. of open bolls/plant, bollweight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2187–2278 · show in text ↑
e2

“foliar feeding with boron and zinc mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2145–2187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron and zinc mixture significantly increased seed cotton yield in cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
foliar feeding with boron and zinc mixturee2
Outcome
seed cotton yield/fede1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly increased no. of fruiting branches/plant, no. of open bolls/plant, bollweight and seed cotton yield/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2187–2304 · show in text ↑
e2

“foliar feeding with boron and zinc mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2145–2187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient foliar treatments had no significant effect on plant height, monopodia per plant and first fruiting node of cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
micronutrients treatmentse1
Outcome
plant height at harvest, no. of monopodia/plant, first fruitingnodee1
Direction
did not exhibite1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“While, micronutrients treatments did not exhibitsignificant effect on plant height at harvest, no. of monopodia/plant, first fruitingnode, days to first flower and first open boll, earliness %, seed index, lintpresenting and fiber properties under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2306–2559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient foliar treatments had no significant effect on days to first flower, days to first open boll and earliness percentage of cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
micronutrients treatmentse1
Outcome
days to first flower and first open boll, earliness %e1
Direction
did not exhibite1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“While, micronutrients treatments did not exhibitsignificant effect on plant height at harvest, no. of monopodia/plant, first fruitingnode, days to first flower and first open boll, earliness %, seed index, lintpresenting and fiber properties under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2306–2559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient foliar treatments had no significant effect on seed index, lint and fiber properties of cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
micronutrients treatmentse1
Outcome
seed index, lintpresenting and fiber propertiese1
Direction
did not exhibite1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“While, micronutrients treatments did not exhibitsignificant effect on plant height at harvest, no. of monopodia/plant, first fruitingnode, days to first flower and first open boll, earliness %, seed index, lintpresenting and fiber properties under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2306–2559 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The irrigation by NPK interaction significantly affected days to first flower, plant height and earliness percentage of cotton.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
irrigation intervals and NPK fertilizer levelse1
Outcome
days to first flower, plant height at harvest, earliness%e1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“The interaction between irrigation intervals and NPK fertilizer levelssignificantly affected days to first flower, plant height at harvest, earliness%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2579–2729 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The irrigation by NPK interaction significantly affected number of open bolls per plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield in both seasons.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
irrigation intervals and NPK fertilizer levelse1
Outcome
no.of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fede1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“The interaction between irrigation intervals and NPK fertilizer levelssignificantly affected days to first flower, plant height at harvest, earliness%, no.of open bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/fed in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2579–2808 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The NPK by foliar interaction significantly affected open bolls per plant and seed cotton yield in one season.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
NPK fertilizer levels and foliar feedinge1
Outcome
no. of open bolls/plant and seedcotton yield/fede1
Qualifier
in one seasone1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“The interaction between NPK fertilizer levels and foliar feeding with somemicronutrients treatments significantly affected no. of open bolls/plant and seedcotton yield/fed in one season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3029–3214 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The NPK by foliar interaction significantly affected fruiting branches per plant and earliness percentage in both seasons.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
NPK fertilizer levels and foliar feedinge1
Outcome
no. of fruiting branches/plant and earliness %e1
Qualifier
in both seasonse1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“The interaction between NPK fertilizer levels and foliar feeding with somemicronutrients treatments significantly affected no. of open bolls/plant and seedcotton yield/fed in one season and no. of fruiting branches/plant and earliness %in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3029–3280 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-way interaction significantly affected boll weight and seed cotton yield in both seasons.

Material
Giza 86 X 10229e0
Treatment
irrigation intervals, NPK fertilizer levels and foliarfeeding with some micronutrients treatmentse1
Outcome
bollweight and seed cotton yield/fede1
Qualifier
in both seasonse1
Setting
Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural ResearchStation at Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, on new promising cotton genotype(Giza 86 X 10229) during 2013 and 2014 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
e1

“The interaction between irrigation intervals, NPK fertilizer levels and foliarfeeding with some micronutrients treatments had a significant effect on no. offruiting branches/plant and no. of open bolls/plant in 2013 season only and bollweight and seed cotton yield/fed in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3372–3656 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

boron atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

49 papers: 46 positive, 3 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

micronutrient · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

irrigation · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 17 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 82 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.