Claim · model-written summary
Cover crops did not negatively influence cash crop yields in fall 2016 or 2017.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1 - Treatment
- Cover cropse0
- Outcome
- cash crop yieldse0
- Direction
- did not negatively influencee0
- Qualifier
- fall 2016 or fall 2017e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cover crops did not negatively influence cash crop yields in fall 2016 or fall 2017.”
e1“corn (Zea mays L.)/soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) rotation”
Title
Cover Crop and No-Tillage Impacts on Soil Health and Soil Nitrogen in Indiana
Jennifer D Woodyard Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) 2018
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Cover crops reduced fall soil nitrate-N versus no cover crops when cover crop growth was good.
- Intervention effect Cover crops also reduced spring soil nitrate-N when growth was good and they did not winter kill.
- Recommendation The authors recommend choosing soil health sampling time according to sampling goals.
- Recommendation For finding cover crop differences with ample spring biomass, sampling corn at V3-V6 may be best.
- Recommendation To detect the highest seasonal soil indicator values, sampling after harvest may be best.