Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Cover‐crop seeding‐date influence on fall nitrogen recovery

Masoud Hashemi; Ali Farsad; Amir Sadeghpour; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
92
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Planting cover crops after corn‐silage harvest could have a critical role in the recovery of residual N and N from fall‐applied manure, which would otherwise be lost to the environment. Experiments were conducted at the University of Massachusetts Research Farm during the 2004–2006 growing seasons. Treatments consisted of oat and winter rye cover crops, and no cover crop, and four cover‐crop dates of planting. The earliest planting dates of oat and winter rye produced the maximum biomass yield and resulted in the highest nitrate accumulation in both cover‐crop species. The average nitrate accumulation for the 3 years in winter rye and oat at the earliest time of planting was 60 and 48 kg ha –1 , respectively. In 2004 where the residual N level was high, winter rye accumulated 119 kg nitrate ha –1 . While initially soil N levels were relatively high in early September they were almost zero at all sampling depths in all plots with and without cover crops later in the fall before the ground was frozen. However, in plots with cover crops, nitrate was accumulated in the cover‐crop tissue, whereas in plots with no cover crop the nitrate was lost to the environment mainly through leaching. The seeding date of cover crops influenced the contribution of N available to the subsequent crop. Corn plants with no added fertilizer, yielded 41% and 34% more silage when planted after oat and rye, respectively, compared with the no–cover crop treatment. Corn‐silage yield decreased linearly when planting of cover crops was delayed from early September to early or mid‐October. Corn‐ear yield was influenced more than silage by the species of cover crop and planting date. Similar to corn silage, ear yield was higher when corn was planted after oat. This could be attributed in part to the winter‐kill of oat, giving it more time to decompose in the soil and subsequent greater release of N, while the rapidly increasing C : N ratio of rye can lessen availability to corn plants. Early plantings of cover crops increased corn‐ear yield up to 59% compared with corn‐ear yield planted after no cover crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earliest oat planting produced maximum biomass yield.

Treatment
earliest planting datese0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The earliest planting dates of oat and winter rye produced the maximum biomass yield and resulted in the highest nitrate accumulation in both cover‐crop species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earliest winter rye planting produced maximum biomass yield.

Taxon
winter ryeSecale cerealee0
Treatment
earliest planting datese0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The earliest planting dates of oat and winter rye produced the maximum biomass yield and resulted in the highest nitrate accumulation in both cover‐crop species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–584 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earliest winter rye planting accumulated 60 kg ha –1 nitrate on average.

Taxon
winter ryeSecale cerealee0
Outcome
nitrate accumulatione0
Value
60e0
Qualifier
earliest time of plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average nitrate accumulation for the 3 years in winter rye and oat at the earliest time of planting was 60 and 48 kg ha –1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–727 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earliest oat planting accumulated 48 kg ha –1 nitrate on average.

Outcome
nitrate accumulatione0
Value
48 kg ha –1e0
Qualifier
earliest time of plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average nitrate accumulation for the 3 years in winter rye and oat at the earliest time of planting was 60 and 48 kg ha –1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–727 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter rye accumulated 119 kg nitrate ha –1 in 2004.

Taxon
winter ryeSecale cerealee0
Outcome
nitratee0
Value
119 kg nitrate ha –1e0
Qualifier
2004e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2004 where the residual N level was high, winter rye accumulated 119 kg nitrate ha –1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After oat cover crops, unfertilized corn yielded 41% more silage than no-cover-crop corn.

Treatment
planted after oate0
Outcome
silagee0
Direction
moree0
Value
41%e0
Comparator
no–cover crop treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn plants with no added fertilizer, yielded 41% and 34% more silage when planted after oat and rye, respectively, compared with the no–cover crop treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After rye cover crops, unfertilized corn yielded 34% more silage than no-cover-crop corn.

Treatment
planted after oat and ryee0
Outcome
silagee0
Direction
moree0
Value
34%e0
Comparator
no–cover crop treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn plants with no added fertilizer, yielded 41% and 34% more silage when planted after oat and rye, respectively, compared with the no–cover crop treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1468 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn silage yield declined linearly as cover-crop planting was delayed.

Treatment
planting of cover crops was delayede0
Outcome
Corn‐silage yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn‐silage yield decreased linearly when planting of cover crops was delayed from early September to early or mid‐October.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1592 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover-crop species and planting date influenced corn-ear yield more than silage yield.

Treatment
species of cover crop and planting datee0
Outcome
Corn‐ear yielde0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn‐ear yield was influenced more than silage by the species of cover crop and planting date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn ear yield was higher after oat cover crops.

Treatment
planted after oate0
Outcome
ear yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar to corn silage, ear yield was higher when corn was planted after oat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1688–1765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early cover-crop planting increased corn-ear yield by up to 59% compared with no cover crop.

Treatment
Early plantings of cover cropse0
Outcome
corn‐ear yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
59%e0
Comparator
no cover crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early plantings of cover crops increased corn‐ear yield up to 59% compared with corn‐ear yield planted after no cover crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1996–2119 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 9 positive, 6 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

sowing time · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 20 positive, 14 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

sowing time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

269 papers: 178 positive, 91 negative or no effect

177 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

265 papers more in this group

See all 269 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.