Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Clipping barren tillers raised grain yield water use efficiency by about 10% versus control.

A claim from Ecological significance of redundancy in tillers of winter wheat(Triticum aestivum) and effect of reducing redundancy on water use efficiency · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping barren tillers raised grain yield water use efficiency by about 10% versus control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
clipping barren tillerse1
Outcome
water use efficiency for grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
about 10%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency for grain yield increased by about 10% compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1664
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–64
t1

“(C)all barren tillers were retained,clipping main stem and fertile tillers at heading stage.The undisturbed plants were considered the controls(CK).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–690
e1

“After clipping barren tillers,the yield was unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1575

Title

Ecological significance of redundancy in tillers of winter wheat(Triticum aestivum) and effect of reducing redundancy on water use efficiency

Ma Shou Acta Ecologica Sinica 2008

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e98cbceeb450822fc146cb6118f4c38d92250ff0ef9981fe63575b9952030101 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

tillage · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

117 papers: 97 positive, 20 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

108 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

mechanical · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.