Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Groundnut pod number per plant was significantly higher under pre-emergence diclosulam followed by hand weeding.

A claim from Weed management in groundnut with diclosulam herbicide · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut pod number per plant was significantly higher under pre-emergence diclosulam followed by hand weeding.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
diclosulam 27 g/ha PE fb) HW at 50 DASe0
Outcome
Number of groundnut pods per plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of groundnut pods per plant and pod yield was significantly higher with diclosulam 27 g/ha PE fb) HW at 50 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–597
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28

Title

Weed management in groundnut with diclosulam herbicide

N. Sridhar; D. Nongmaithem; Lanunola Tzudir; et al. Indian Journal of Weed Science 2021. doi:10.5958/0974-8164.2021.00056.3

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e994fc8492abbe2b3c232d9fcff2d0613078453cd58df64b9fa2f6bd197976f4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Diclosulam · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

29 papers: 22 positive, 7 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

230 papers: 172 positive, 58 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this claim · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

221 papers more in this group

See all 230 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.