Intervention effectmodel-written summary

That treatment gave the highest net return of ₹ 1,07,335/ha.

A claim from Weed management in groundnut with diclosulam herbicide · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That treatment gave the highest net return of ₹ 1,07,335/ha.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
diclosulam 27 g/ha PE fb) HW at 50 DASe0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
₹ 1,07,335/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of groundnut pods per plant and pod yield was significantly higher with diclosulam 27 g/ha PE fb) HW at 50 DAS and also gave the highest net return of ₹ 1,07,335/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–651
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–28

Title

Weed management in groundnut with diclosulam herbicide

N. Sridhar; D. Nongmaithem; Lanunola Tzudir; et al. Indian Journal of Weed Science 2021. doi:10.5958/0974-8164.2021.00056.3

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-f65815e6c627335abf4c1d5149f05bc97b5b6e2685e95e6f5ee3208711c77e97 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Diclosulam · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

29 papers: 22 positive, 7 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Encapsulated diclosulam gave a 1.80 benefit cost ratio in Kharif.

    Novel method to manage weeds in the rainfed groundnut (var. VRI 8 and TMV 14) using nano encapsulated herbicide formulations · 2022

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. no effect
    Diclosulam did not affect peanut yield.

    Diclosulam Does Not Influence Yields in Eight Virginia Market-Type Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Cultivars1 · 2000

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Diclosulam did not affect peanut yield in any cultivar.

    Response of Three Runner Market-Type Peanut Cultivars to Diclosulam1 · 2002

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Diclosulam did not affect peanut yield without weeds.

    Influence of Diclosulam Postemergence Application Timing on Weed Control and Peanut Tolerance · 2006

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Diclosulam did not adversely affect peanut yield.

    Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Response to Carfentrazone-ethyl and Pyraflufen-ethyl Applied Close to Harvest · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Preemergence diclosulam reduced peanut yield in Oklahoma.

    Peanut Cultivar Response to Diclosulam in the Southwest Peanut Growing Region · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Pre-emergence diclosulam at 0.025 kg a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS followed by hand weeding on 40 DAS (T2) gave pod and haulm yield on par with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (T9).

    Effect of pre and post-emergence herbicides on growth and yield attributes and yield of groundnut · 2023 · compared with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (T9)

    No difference from an alternative

  8. no effect
    The two dimethenamid preemergence options gave equivalent peanut yields and net returns without significant differences.

    Economic Assessment of New Weed Management Technologies in Strip- and Conventional-Tillage Cotton and Peanut and Common Ragweed Interference in Peanut. · 2001 · compared with flumioxazin

    No difference from an alternative

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

230 papers: 172 positive, 58 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this claim · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Hand weeding yielded 1802 kg ha-1 pods in Kharif.

    Novel method to manage weeds in the rainfed groundnut (var. VRI 8 and TMV 14) using nano encapsulated herbicide formulations · 2022

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
    Hand weeding twice gave higher groundnut plant height, dry matter accumulation and pod yield.

    Herbicide mixtures effect on weed control, growth and yield of groundnut · 2025

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. negative
    The highest herbicide rates reduced yield for most crops.

    Cotton, Peanut, and Soybean Response to Sublethal Rates of Dicamba, Glufosinate, and 2,4-D · 2012

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Peanuts kept weed free for 6 weeks after emergence had seed yield reduced by no more than 3% compared with season-long weed-free peanuts.

    Bristly Starbur (Acanthospermum hispidum) Interference in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) · 1989 · compared with maintained weed free for the entire season

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    No differences in peanut yield were observed between PPI or PRE applications of either ethalfluralin or pendimethalin.

    Annual Grass Control with Preplant Incorporated and Preemergence Applications of Ethalfluralin and Pendimethalin in PeanutArachis hypogaea1 · 2001 · compared with PPI

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Postemergence herbicides generally did not improve peanut yield.

    Flumioxazin Systems for Weed Management in North Carolina Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)1 · 2002

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    The winter fallow high herbicide input system yielded 7 to 26% less peanut than the highest yielding system with a winter cover crop.

    Weed Control In Peanut Grown in a High-Residue Conservation-Tillage System · 2007 · compared with highest yielding system that included a winter cover crop

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    At-planting herbicide alone gave lower peanut yields.

    Management of Broadleaf Signalgrass (Brachiaria platyphylla) in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with Herbicides · 1982

    Opposite direction

221 papers more in this group

See all 230 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.