Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Jatropha oil cake at 1.5 t/ha increased okra fresh shoot weight by 73.3% over the check.

A claim from Management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra through Oilcakes amendment · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jatropha oil cake at 1.5 t/ha increased okra fresh shoot weight by 73.3% over the check.

Treatment
jatropha oil cake @ 1.5 t/hae1
Outcome
fresh shoot weighte1
Direction
increasee1
Value
73.3%e1
Comparator
over checke1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“jatropha oil cake @ 1.5 t/ha was most effective organic amendment performing better than others contributing significantly increase in plant height by 72.8%, fresh shoot weight by 73.3%, fresh root weight by 84.9%, dry shoot weight by 80.0%, dry root weight by 87.6% and biomass yield by 80.8%, respectively with corresponding decrease in order of number of root galls by 86.0%, number of egg masses by 87.3% and root knot nematode population by 87.3% over check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–930
t0

“Management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra through Oilcakes amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70

Title

Management of Meloidogyne incognita in Okra through Oilcakes amendment

J.K. Mahalik; Nachiketa Sahoo; Poornata Jena Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 2016

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e9d9f0c41cdf714bfb34e7883ecaf4e0e7abb17554e3db94eaf970cb4bcad233 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

botanical · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 49 positive, 8 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.