Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cultivar CTC4 had a lower number of stalks per hectare and lower water use efficiency under regulated deficit irrigation than under non-irrigation.

A claim from Productivity, Technological Attributes and Water Use Efficiency of Sugarcane Cultivars Under Regulated Deficit Irrigation · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar CTC4 had a lower number of stalks per hectare and lower water use efficiency under regulated deficit irrigation than under non-irrigation.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
CTC4e7
Treatment
RDIe7
Outcome
number of stalks per hectare and water use efficiencye6
Direction
lowere6
Comparator
non-irrigation conditionse6

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“sugar and stalk yield of five sugarcane cultivars subjected to RDI and non-irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–592
e7

“The cultivar ‘CTC4’ showed little responsiveness to RDI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1508
e6

“presenting a lower number of stalks per hectare and water use efficiency in relation to its growth under non-irrigation conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1640

Title

Productivity, Technological Attributes and Water Use Efficiency of Sugarcane Cultivars Under Regulated Deficit Irrigation

Anderson P. Coelho; Alexandre B. Dalri; Estêvão P. A. Landell; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science 2018. doi:10.5539/jas.v10n7p174

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e9fad421edc19a68190fc072e4257264308053f9c06372f348bb6fcf7f241d16 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

irrigation · physiology: water · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.